Mundra House, 822-A, Shivaju Nagar, Civil Lines, jaipur-302006 9314501680, 9314501791

B.P.Mundra

मानवता से काम करें मन के सारे काम अपने आप हो जायेंगे

इस महीने के इम्पोर्टेंट काम
  • Home
  • GST
  • Cases Income tax
  • MCA
  • Subsidy
  • TDS
  • About Us
  • contact us
  • Login
    • Admin Login
    • Staff Login
    • User Login
  • Loan
  • Apply for job
  • Click Here
  • HOW TO
  • To file ITR for AY 2022-23 kindly give details (and also evidence if yes) of following
  • Categories
    • Articles
    • Authority
    • Benami Transactions (Prohibition)
    • client
    • Constitution of India
    • Finance Act 1994
    • formalities to be completed
    • GST
    • Happiness
    • HOW TO
    • Income Tax
    • Indian Evidence Act 1872
    • Job Application
    • MCA
    • Office system
    • Papers required for filing
    • Principal of mutuality
    • rajasthan public trust
    • Smile
    • Subsidy
    • work report

132

B.P.Mundra > Income Tax > Cases Income tax > 132

(→ for subcategory see right ) (for subcategory scroll Below)
  • Section 132, 153A What AO can do with item found in search is already disclosed in ITR and Balance Sheet submitted?IT-CASES-210-2020

  • दिल्ली हाईकोर्ट ने 1 अगस्त 2017 को फैसला देते हुए कहा कि आयकर छापे के दौरान धारा 132 4 में लिए गए स्टेटमेंट अपने आप में incriminating material नहीं है केवल इस आधार पर ना तो assumption of jurisdiction u/s 153 A हो सकता है और ना ही कोई एडिशन किया जा सकता है.PCIT vs.BEST INFRASTRUCTURE (INDIA) PVT. LTD. & ORS. IT-CASES-208-2020

  • Section 147, 132 Gujarat High Court on 25 February, 2020 held that when Search and seizure of incriminating ‎material is at third party and have not in the name of or in hand writings or signature of the ‎assessee, also no such transaction is with third party then in the absence of any other ‎independent material to corroborate the statement of third party no addition can be made.‎ it-cases-205-2020

  • No addition as undisclosed income can be made on the basis of documents which are dumb and incapable of any interpretation in proceedings u/s 132, 158BC read with Section 158BD.-IT-CASES-204-2020

  • Retraction of statement given in search u/s132(4). Mere admission of additional income would not automatically entitle the assessing officer to assess the same, if the assessee disputes the same subsequently with corroborative evidences. IT-CASES-202-2020

  • Since no incriminating material was unearthed by AO during the course of search ‎operation under section 132, therefore no addition could be made during the ‎relevant assessment year under section 153A. Mona Agarwal & Anr. v. ACIT

  • For the purpose of carrying forward the loss in terms of section 72 read with ‎section 80 of the Act, in a case where search operations have been conducted ‎under section 132 of the Act, the time to file the return within the meaning of ‎section 139(3) of the Act has to be regarded as the reasonable time afforded by ‎the consequent notice under section 153A(1)(a) of the Act.‎

  • When search operations are conducted under section 132 of the Act, the ‎obligation of the assessee to file any return remains suspended till such time that a ‎notice is issued for such purpose under section 153A(1)(a) of the Act. If the return ‎is filed by the assessee within the reasonable time permitted by such notice under ‎section 153A(1)(a) of the Act, such return would then be deemed to have been ‎filed within the time permitted under section 139(1) of the Act for the benefit ‎under section 139(3) of the Act to be availed of by the assessee.‎

  • The consideration that the loss in any year may be carried forward to the ‎subsequent year and set off against the profits and gains in the subsequent year is ‎a question that has to be determined by the assessing officer who deals with the ‎assessment of the subsequent year.‎

  • incriminating material found in survey

Post navigation

← Previous 1 2 3 Next →

Sub Categories of 132

  • No categories