Mundra House, 822-A, Shivaju Nagar, Civil Lines, jaipur-302006 9314501680, 9314501791

B.P.Mundra

मानवता से काम करें मन के सारे काम अपने आप हो जायेंगे

इस महीने के इम्पोर्टेंट काम
  • Home
  • GST
  • Cases Income tax
  • MCA
  • Subsidy
  • TDS
  • About Us
  • contact us
  • Login
    • Admin Login
    • Staff Login
    • User Login
  • Loan
  • Apply for job
  • Click Here
  • HOW TO
  • To file ITR for AY 2020-21 kindly give details (and also evidence if yes) of following
  • Categories
    • Articles
    • Authority
    • Benami Transactions (Prohibition)
    • client
    • Constitution of India
    • Finance Act 1994
    • formalities to be completed
    • GST
    • Happiness
    • HOW TO
    • Income Tax
    • Indian Evidence Act 1872
    • Job Application
    • MCA
    • Office system
    • Papers required for filing
    • Principal of mutuality
    • rajasthan public trust
    • Smile
    • Subsidy
    • work report

AY 2017-18

B.P.Mundra > Income Tax > Cases Income tax > AY 2017-18

(→ for subcategory see right ) (for subcategory scroll Below)
  • Search and Seizure- No seizure of jewellery when it is stock of the assessee as the protection is provided in proviso appearing after sub clause – (iii) to sub Section (1) of Section 132 for stock. Further Satisfaction note clearly disclosed that formulation of “reason to believe” was post search and seizure. Action of search and seizure is bad in law. Saddle the Deptt. with costs at Rs.50,000/-. KHEM CHAND MUKIM Vs.Principal Director of Income Tax. Jan 9, 2020 IT-CASES-214-2020

  • Demonetisation, Section 115BBE, 69, 154, 133A- ITAT- Jaipur- on 9 June, 2020 held that ‎the provisions of section 115BBE which are contingent on satisfaction of requirements ‎of section 69 cannot be independently applied by invoking the provisions of section 154 of ‎the Act when provisions of section 69 have been invoked by the Assessing officer while ‎passing the assessment order u/s 143(3) and at the same time, he has failed to apply the rate of ‎tax as per section 115BBE of the Act. ACIT… vs Shri Sudesh Kumar Gupta, Alwar. In ‎Favour of the assessee ‎

  • Kindly note Supreme Court in Vodafone Idea on 29th April 2020 held that there is ‎assessment year wise regime in processing of refund u/s 143(1) ‎

  • Madras High Court decision on 5 March, 2020 on stay of demand-consequences of not ‎depositing of 20% of total demand within 30 days alongwith stay application- CBDT’s ‎instruction on stay of demand

Sub Categories of AY 2017-18

  • No categories