Mundra House, 822-A, Shivaju Nagar, Civil Lines, jaipur-302006 9314501680, 9314501791

B.P.Mundra

मानवता से काम करें मन के सारे काम अपने आप हो जायेंगे

इस महीने के इम्पोर्टेंट काम
  • Home
  • GST
  • Cases Income tax
  • MCA
  • Subsidy
  • TDS
  • About Us
  • contact us
  • Login
    • Admin Login
    • Staff Login
    • User Login
  • Loan
  • Apply for job
  • Click Here
  • HOW TO
  • To file ITR for AY 2022-23 kindly give details (and also evidence if yes) of following
  • Categories
    • Articles
    • Authority
    • Benami Transactions (Prohibition)
    • client
    • Constitution of India
    • Finance Act 1994
    • formalities to be completed
    • GST
    • Happiness
    • HOW TO
    • Income Tax
    • Indian Evidence Act 1872
    • Job Application
    • MCA
    • Office system
    • Papers required for filing
    • Principal of mutuality
    • rajasthan public trust
    • Smile
    • Subsidy
    • work report

B.P.MUNDRA

Mundra House, 822-A, Shivaju Nagar, Civil Lines, jaipur-302006 9314501680, 9314501791


कंपनीज की ऑडिट करने वाले कृपया ध्यान दें, अगर ऑडिट रिपोर्ट में इन्वेस्टमेंट के बारे में प्रॉपर्ली डिस्क्लोज नहीं किया तो सीए को पेनल्टी लगेगी इसी प्रकार कोई भी डिस्क्लोजर बाकी रह गया तो पेनल्टी लगेगी-Penalty u/s Section 450 or Failure to disclose properly in an audit report details of current investment by virtue of section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013

B.P.Mundra > Articles > MCA > Section 143 > कंपनीज की ऑडिट करने वाले कृपया ध्यान दें, अगर ऑडिट रिपोर्ट में इन्वेस्टमेंट के बारे में प्रॉपर्ली डिस्क्लोज नहीं किया तो सीए को पेनल्टी लगेगी इसी प्रकार कोई भी डिस्क्लोजर बाकी रह गया तो पेनल्टी लगेगी-Penalty u/s Section 450 or Failure to disclose properly in an audit report details of current investment by virtue of section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013

admin February 27, 2023 0 Comments

2013, Companies Act, Section 143, Section 450

2013, Companies Act 2013, Failure to disclose in audit report details of  current investments, Failure to disclose properly in an audit report, Penalty u/s Section 450, Penalty u/s Section 450 or Failure to disclose properly in an audit report details of  current investment by virtue of section 143 of the Companies Act, Penalty u/s Section 450 or Failure to disclose properly in an audit report details of  current investment by virtue of section 143 of the Companies Act 2013, section 143

 302 total views

Penalty u/s Section 450 or Failure to disclose properly in an audit report details of  current investment by virtue of section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013

Failure to disclose in audit report details of  current investments

  1. The name of the body corporate in whom investments have been madeindicates separately whether such bodies are (i)subsidiaries, (ii) associates, (iii) joint ventures, (iv) controlled special purpose entities
  2. The following details are required:-
    1. the nature and extent of the investment made in each such body corporate
    2. showing separately investments which are partly-paid
    3. disclose the basis of valuation of such investments as per the requirements of Schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013

Government of India Ministry Of Corporate Affairs

Office of the Registrar of Companies, Bihar-Cum-Official Liquidator, High Court, Patna 4th Floor, ‘A’ Wing, Maurya Lok Complex

Dakbunglow Road, Patna-800001 Order No. ROC/PAT/SCN/143/38519/2662 Dated: 17.02.2023

Order for penalty for violation of section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 In the matter of

ANGEL GEMS AND JEWELLERY PRIVATE LIMITED CIN: U74999B1R2011PTC038519

 

Appointment of Adjudication Officer-

 

  1. The Ministry of Corporate Affairs vide its Gazette Notification No. A-42011/112/2014- Ad. II dated03.2015 has appointed the undersigned as Adjudicating Officer in exercise of the powers conferred under section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013 (herein after known as Act) read with Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014 for adjudging penalties under the provisions of this Ad.

 

Company:-

 

  1. As per the record of MCA Portal and AOC-4 filed by the company- Angel Gems And Jewellery Private Limited, ON- U74999BR2011PTC038519, (hereinafter referred to as the company) for the financialyears ending on 31.03.2018, Anupam Sarkar (Membership no. 08028842) is the Auditor of the company.

Facts about the case:-

  1. As per Schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013, for the head “Current Investments” the Company should disclose in its Balance Sheet under each classification, details shall be given of all the names of the body

 

Under each classification, details shall be given of names of the bodies corporate [indicating separately whether such bodies are: (i) subsidiaries, (ii) associates, (iii) joint ventures, or (iv) controlled special purpose entities] in whom investments have been made and the nature and extent of the investment so made in each such body corporate (showing separately investments which are partly paid). In regard to investments in the capital of partnership firms, the names of the firms (with the names of all their partners, total capital and the shares of each partner) shall be given.

 

The following shall also be disclosed:-

 

  • The basis of valuation of individual investments;

 

  • Aggregate amount of quoted investments and market value thereof;

 

  • Aggregate amount of unquoted investments;

 

  • Aggregate provision made for diminution in value of investments.

 

Upon perusal of Balance Sheet for the financial years 2017-2018, it is observed that the Company has shown an amount of Rs. 3,09,72,680 as current investment.

However, the Company has failed to disclose the details of the name of the body corporate (indicating separately whether such bodies are (i) subsidiaries, (ii) associates, (iii) joint ventures, or (iv) controlled special purpose entities) in whom investments have been made and the nature and extent of the investment so made in each such body corporate (showing separately investments which are partly-paid), further it has also failed to disclose the basis of valuation of such investments as per the requirements of Schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013, thereby affecting the true & fair view of the state of affairs of the Company leading to contravention of the provisions of Section 129 read with Schedule III of the Companies Act, 2013.

 

However, the auditor has failed to comment on the same in the audit report for the aforesaid financial year.

 

That by virtue of section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013, it is the statutory duty of the Auditor to report the violations of the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 in his Audit Report However, the auditor has failed to report the violations of the provisions of Companies Act 2013 in the said Audit Report for the FY 2017-2018; for which the Auditor, viz., for the financial year ending on 31.03.2018-Anupam Sarkar is liable for penalty u/s. 450 of the Companies Act, 2013.

 

  1. Whereas, this office has issued show cause notice for default under section 143 of the Companies Act 2013 vide this office letter no. ROC/PAT/SCN/sec.143/38519/2422 dated 04.012.23.

 

  1. However, this office has not received any reply from the above said auditor. Hence, it is concluded that the provisions of Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 has been contravened by the auditor and therefore he is liable for penalty u/s. 450 of the Companies Act 2013 for the Financial Year 2017-2018.

 

Section 450 states that- “If a company or any officer of a company or any other person contravenes any of the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder, or any condition, limitation or restriction subject to which any approval, sanction, consent, confirmation, recognition, direction or exemption in relation to any matter has been accorded, given or granted, and for which no penalty or punishment is provided elsewhere in this Act, the company and every officer of the company who is in default or such other person shall be liable to a penalty of ten thousand rupees, and in case of continuing contravention, with a further penalty of one thousand rupees for each day after the first during which the contravention continues, subject to a maximum of two lakh rupees in case of a company and fifty thousand rupees in case of an officer who is in default or any other person”.

 

  1. Further Section 446 states that “if penalty is payable for non-compliance of any of the provisions of this Act by a One Person Company, small company, start-up company or Producer Company, or by any of its officer in default, or any other person in respect of such company, then such company, its officer in default or any other person, as the case may be, shall be liable to a penalty which shall not be more than one-half of the penalty specified in such provisions subject to a maximum of two lakh rupees in case of a company and one lakh rupees in case of an officer who is in default or any other person, as the case may be”.

 

  1. As per clause 85 of section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013, small company means a company whose paid up capital and turnover shall not exceed rupees four crore and rupees forty erase respectively. As per MCA portal, paid up capital of the company- Angel Gents And Jewellery Private Limited is Rs. 9,64,000/- and the turnover of the company is Rs. 5,204,654.00 as per Financial Year 20152016. Therefore, the benefits of small company are extended to this noticee while adjudicating penalty.

 

ORDER

 

  1. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and after taking into account the provisions of Rule-11 of Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014 (as amended), I hereby impose a penalty of 5,000 (Five Thousand) on Shri Anupam Sarkar, Chartered Accountants- Membership no. 08028842 as perTable

 

Below for violation of Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 for the financial year 2017-2018:

 

 

Nature of default

 

Violation of

Section of the

Companies

Act, 2013

 

Company/ Officers

to whom penalty

imposed

 

 

No. of days in

default

 

Penalty for

defaults (Rs.) as

per Section 450

of the Act

Total

Penalty

Rs.

 

Penalty Imposed As per 446B of Act 
Non-reporting of

violations/ non

compliance made

by the company in

audit report

 

Section

143

 

on Shri Anupam

Sarakar, Chartered

Accountants

Membership no.

08028842

 

FY 2017-

2018

 

10000 10000 5,000

 

 

  1. The noticee shall pay the amount of penalty individually by way of e-payment (available on Ministry websitemca.gov.in) under “Pay miscellaneous fees” category in MCA fee and payment Services within 90 (ninety) days of this order. The Challan/SRN generated after payment of penalty through online mode shall be forwarded to this office.

 

  1. Appeal against this order may be filled in writing with the Regional Director (ER), Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Kolkata, within a period of 60 (sixty) days from the date of receipt of this order, in Form ADJ (available on Ministry website mca.gov.in) setting forth the grounds of appeal and shall be accompanied by a certified copy of this order (Section 454(5) and 454(6) of the Act read with Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014).

 

  1. Please note that if the noticee does not pay the penalty amount imposed herein within a period of ninety days from the date of receipt of the copy of the order, he shall be punishable with imprisonment which may extend to six months or with fine which shall not be less than twenty-five thousand rupees but which may extend to one lath rupees, or with both in terms of section 454 (8) (ii) of the Companies Act, 2013; apart from the liability to pay the penalty amount in compliance to this order, and for which prosecution will be filed without further notice in this regard.

 

 

To:-

Anupam Sarkar,

I-, Chartered Accountant, 1/52, Bijaygargh, Kolkata,

Pin Code- 700032, West Bengal, India.

Copy to:-

The Regional Direaor (ER), Ministry of Corporate Affairs,

234/4 A.J.C. Bose Road, 2M MSO Building,

20 Floor, Kolkata 700020, for information please

 

(Aparajit Banta) Adjudicating Officer & Registrar of Companies-Cum- Official Liquidator, Patna

 

Total Page Visits: 2931 - Today Page Visits: 94

← Previous post

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Categories

  • 1860 (1)
  • 1956 (1)
  • 1973 (1)
  • 2002 (1)
  • 2013 (1)
  • Articles (77)
  • Authority (1)
  • Benami Transactions (Prohibition) (1)
  • client (59)
  • Code of Criminal Procedure (0)
  • Companies Act (2)
  • Constitution of India (2)
  • Cr.P.C. (2)
  • Due dates (1)
  • Finance Act 1994 (0)
  • formalities to be completed (6)
  • GST (59)
  • Happiness (4)
  • HOW TO (47)
  • HUF Property (1)
  • Income Tax (294)
  • Indian Evidence Act 1872 (1)
  • Indian Penal Code (1)
  • invalid notice (1)
  • Job Application (0)
  • MCA (3)
  • Notice 148 (0)
  • Office system (9)
  • Papers required for filing (6)
  • PMLA Act (1)
  • Prevention of Money Laundering Act (1)
  • Principal of mutuality (1)
  • rajasthan public trust (2)
  • Smile (7)
  • Subsidy (5)
  • work report (2)
  • Archives

    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019

    Recent Posts

    • कंपनीज की ऑडिट करने वाले कृपया ध्यान दें, अगर ऑडिट रिपोर्ट में इन्वेस्टमेंट के बारे में प्रॉपर्ली डिस्क्लोज नहीं किया तो सीए को पेनल्टी लगेगी इसी प्रकार कोई भी डिस्क्लोजर बाकी रह गया तो पेनल्टी लगेगी-Penalty u/s Section 450 or Failure to disclose properly in an audit report details of current investment by virtue of section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013
    • Consequences if one fails to furnish three consecutive returns of GST and the department cancels the registration?
    • Consequence when there is a delay of only 41 minutes in delivering the consignment and the Adjudicating Authority passed the order of creating Demand of Tax and Penalty of Rs.19,52,542/-
    • Mere pendency of that investigation would not sustain a Provisional Attachment Order(POA) based on allegations which do not form part of those proceedings. Delhi High Court passed the order on 24.01.2023. Kindly click the link to get full order.
    • Q: Whether outstanding demand from a company can be recovered u/s 179 from the director of the company without pointing out that non-recovery was on account of gross negligent, misfeasance or breach of duty on part of the Director in relation to the affairs of the company? The answer was given by The Hon’ble High Court Of Gujarat on dated 16.12.2022