Mundra House, 822-A, Shivaju Nagar, Civil Lines, jaipur-302006 9314501680, 9314501791

B.P.Mundra

मानवता से काम करें मन के सारे काम अपने आप हो जायेंगे

इस महीने के इम्पोर्टेंट काम
  • Home
  • GST
  • Cases Income tax
  • MCA
  • Subsidy
  • TDS
  • About Us
  • contact us
  • Login
    • Admin Login
    • Staff Login
    • User Login
  • Loan
    • Apply for jobs
  • Apply for job
  • Click Here
  • Viability Research

Monthly Archive: November 2019

B.P.Mundra > 2019 > November

Eligible credit को मात्र इस आधार पर दिए जाने से मना नहीं किया जा सकता कि निर्धारिती ने TRAN-1 form सही नहीं भरा। सरकार या तो ऑनलाइन TRAN-1 सही करने का ऑप्शन दें या मैनुअली भरे हुए को सही मानकर क्लेम स्वीकार करें

 16 total views

 16 total views Eligible credit को मात्र इस आधार पर दिए जाने से मना नहीं किया जा सकता कि निर्धारिती ने TRAN-1 form  सही नहीं भरा। सरकार या तो ऑनलाइन TRAN-1 सही करने का ऑप्शन दें या मैनुअली भरे हुए को…
Read more

117(1), 120A, 140(1), 140(2), 140(5), 164, 226, Central Excise Act 1944, Central Goods & Service Tax Act 2017, Central Goods Service Tax Rules 2017, Cenvat Credit Rules, Constitution of India, GST, Gujrat High Court

November 29, 2019

No addition as undisclosed income can be made on the basis of documents which are dumb and incapable of any interpretation in proceedings u/s 132, 158BC read with Section 158BD

 11 total views

 11 total views No addition as undisclosed income can be made on the basis of documents which are dumb and incapable of any interpretation in proceedings u/s 132, 158BC read with Section 158BD   PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. VIRENDER…
Read more

132, 158BC, 158BD, High Court, incriminating material

November 19, 2019

Assessment framed in the name of non-existing entity/ died person is null and voidab initio ITAT BOMBAY on Nov 6, 2019

 26 total views

 26 total views Assessment framed in the name of non-existing entity/ died person is null and voidab initio ITAT BOMBAY on Nov 6, 2019   M/S. CHURU TRADING CO. PRIVATE LIMITED (Now Mergced with Spirit Textiles Pvt. Ltd.) AND ANR. vs….
Read more

143(3), 144C, 153, 153(1), 153(3), 170, ITAT Mumbai

November 17, 2019

It is well settled that in case the books of accounts are rejected the income of the business in which the Assessee was engaged can be determined by estimating the profit rate considering past history.

 20 total views

 20 total views INCOME TAX OFFICER vs. ASHOK KUMAR PROP. M/S CHHABRA TIMBER STORE IN THE ITAT CHANDIGARH BENCH ‘A’ N.K. SAINI, VP & RAJPAL YADAV, JM. ITA No. 12/Chd/2019 8 Nov, 2019 Section 36(1)(iii), 44AB, 133A, 143(1), 143(3), 144, 145(3…
Read more

133A, 143(1), 143(3), 144, 145(3), 36(1)(iii), 44AB, Chandigarh ITAT

November 16, 2019

Though the limitation period is available for passing the order, not for service but as per the settled issue, the order must be served on the assessee within the reasonable time otherwise Order is Annulled.

 18 total views

 18 total views Nov 8, 2019-ITAT VISHAKAPATNAM hold that The additional ground is admitted if it goes to the root of the order. Though the limitation period is available for passing the order, not for service but as per the settled…
Read more

263-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue, Limitation period, Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Section 263, VISHAKAPATNAM TRIBUNAL

November 16, 2019

Nov 8, 2019-ITAT VISHAKAPATNAM hold that The additional ground is admitted if it goes to the root of the order.

 10 total views

 10 total views Nov 8, 2019-ITAT VISHAKAPATNAM hold that The additional ground is admitted if it goes to the root of the order. Though the limitation period is available for passing the order, not for service but as per the settled…
Read more

263-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue, Additional Ground, Limitation period, Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Section 263, VISHAKAPATNAM TRIBUNAL

November 16, 2019

1.4.2017 से केवल धारा 143(2) की प्रोसिडिंग के आधार पर करदाता का रिफंड नहीं रोका जा सकता

 11 total views

 11 total views केवल धारा 143(2) की प्रोसिडिंग के आधार पर करदाता का रिफंड नहीं रोका जा सकता 14th Oct;2019 को दिल्ली हाईकोर्ट ने फैसला देते हुए कहा कि 1.4.2017 से धारा 241 हटा दी गई है। धारा 241A के प्रावधानों…
Read more

141(1)(D), 143(2), 241, 241A, Delhi High Court

November 16, 2019

No valid addition can be made by merely proceeded to make allegation of suppression of production on the basis of excess consumption of manufacturing cost and electricity consumption it cannot be concluded that the assessee’s books of account were not reliable or the assessee is engaged in producing finished goods outside the books of account.

 10 total views

 10 total views On 4th Nov, 2019, ITAT CUTTACK held that no valid addition can be made by merely proceeded to make allegation of suppression of production on the basis of excess consumption of manufacturing cost and electricity consumption it cannot…
Read more

145(3), ITAT CUTTACK

November 16, 2019

सही पते पर आयकर नोटिस नहीं भेजने पर धारा 271(1)(b) का ऑर्डर रद्द किया गया

 14 total views

 14 total views सही पते पर आयकर नोटिस नहीं भेजने पर धारा 271(1)(b) का ऑर्डर रद्द किया गया इनकम टैक्स अपीलेट ट्रिब्यूनल दिल्ली बेंच ने फैसला देते हुए कहा कि अगर नोटिस धारा 271(1)(b) का उस एड्रेस पर दिया है जो…
Read more

271(1)(b), Delhi Tribunal

November 16, 2019

अगर कदाता को धारा 143(3) द्वारा पारित ऑर्डर्स में किसी छूट को लगातार दिया जा रहा है तो कर निर्धारण अधिकारी को principle of of consistency के आधार पर वह छूट देनी पड़ेगी राजकोट ट्रिब्यूनल के 20.9.2019 के फैसले

 24 total views

 24 total views SURENDRANAGAR DISTRICT CO-OP. MILK PRODUCERS UNION LTD. vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RAJKOT TRIBUNAL RAJPAL YADAV, JM & WASEEM AHMED, AM. ITA No. 262-263/Rjt/2018 Sep 20, 2019 (2019) 57 CCH 0073 RajkotTrib Legislation Referred to Section 36(1)(va),…
Read more

143(3), Principle of consistency, Rajkot Tribunal

November 16, 2019

Post navigation

1 2 3 … 27 Next →

Categories

  • Articles (41)
  • Authority (1)
  • Benami Transactions (Prohibition) (1)
  • client (53)
  • Constitution of India (1)
  • Finance Act 1994 (0)
  • formalities to be completed (1)
  • GST (56)
  • Income Tax (199)
  • Indian Evidence Act 1872 (1)
  • Job Application (0)
  • MCA (2)
  • Office system (5)
  • Papers required for filing (6)
  • Principal of mutuality (1)
  • rajasthan public trust (2)
  • Smile (6)
  • Subsidy (5)
  • work report (2)

    • Archives

    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019

    Recent Posts

    • Section 54F, 139(4) ITAT, Jaipur on 6th march, 2020 Respectfully following the judgement of Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Shankar Lal Saini [2018] 89 taxmann.com 235(Raj) held that even amount deposited in Capital Gain Account Scheme before filing of return u/s 139(4) shall also be allowed for deduction as per provisions of sub- section 4 of section 54F of the Act. Smt. Renu Jain, New Delhi vs Ito. AY 2011-12
    • Rule 3A r.w.s sub-clause (b) of clause (ii) of the proviso to sub-clause (vi) of clause (2) of section 17 How to get a hospital approved so that tax exemptions can be obtained by employee for medical costs incurred by employer in the prescribed treatment.
    • Friends this case is belonging to Section 132, 143(1), 153A(1) and 153C. ITAT DELHI on Jun 30, 2020 on the issue of determining the six assessment years prior to the date of search. Facts in brief are that the document of the assessee was found during search operation on dated 9.10.2014 at the premises of Shri Mulchand Malu and Shri Vikas Malu and therefore the assessee was the “other person” to be assessed u/s 153C. Further there was undisputed facts that the documents etc., were handed-over to the A.O. of the assessee was in the month of September, 2016. It was held that therefore the six assessment years prior to the date of search in the case of the assessee is A.Ys. 2011-2012 to 2016-2017. Therefore, there is no jurisdiction with the A.O. to pass assessment order for the assessment year 2009-10 and the same was held to be without jurisdiction, void abinitio and was quashed. ACIT vs. KUBER PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. AY 2009-2010. In favour of the assessee
    • Section 144 r.w. Section 145(3): ITAT JAIPUR on Jun 19, 2020 held that Even if the books f ‎accounts rejected by invoking provisions of Section 145(3) due doubt on genuineness of the ‎purchases, the A.O. is bound to frame the assessment on best assessment as per provisions of ‎Section 144 r.w. Section 145(3). Therefore, after rejection of books of account, the A.O. is ‎required to estimate the income of the assessee on some reasonable and proper basis. Once the ‎past year results have attained finality and not in dispute, the same can form the basis for ‎estimating the GP rate for the current year. KEDIA EXPORTS PVT. LTD. & ANR. vs. ‎ACIT. AY 2009-10, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 Decision in favour of Assessee
    • Section 127, 132(4) HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY on Jul 15, 2019 held that when the ‎assessment of an Assessee is being transferred from one Commissionerate to another, the ‎requirement of hearing and following the principle of natural justice is inbuilt in the ‎statutory provisions contained in Section 127 of the Act. Therefore the giving of notice to ‎the assessee containing the reasons and the statements or even the gist of the statements ‎to the extent relevant for the proposed action is a basic postulate. The views of the ‎noticee are to be considered by the authority before taking any decision to confirm or ‎drop the notice. A show cause notice to be effective must be adequate so as to enable a ‎party to effectively object/respond to the same. The authority concerned is obliged to ‎consider the objections, if any, and thereafter, reach a finding one way or the other. The ‎impugned order is quashed. NARESH MANAKCHAND JAIN vs PCIT. IN favour of the ‎assessee.‎