Monthly Archive: January 2021

Demonetization . Deposit of cash into bank. Before making addition for cash deposit into bank during Demonetization period the Ld. AO has to consider on merits the opening balance for which evidence were produced for allowing credit of cash withdrawal, financials of previous years and audit report if any. Accordingly, the issues raised in this appeal are restored to the files of the Assessing Officer. ITAT- Bangalore in the case of Sri Mohan Ramachandra Basawa, … vs ITO on on 20 January, 2021. Section 68, 69A and 115BBE:

652 total views

652 total views Demonetization . Deposit of cash into bank. Before making addition for cash deposit into bank during Demonetization period the Ld. AO has to consider on merits the opening balance for which evidence were produced for allowing credit of…
Read more

115BBE, 68, 69A-Unexplained money, AY 2017-18, Bangalore Tribunal, Demonetization, In favour of Assessee (Partly)

January 23, 2021

Section 68, 69A and 115BBE: Demonetization . Deposit of cash into bank. Where the assessee proves that regular bank deposits of cash from 01.04.2016 to 2.11.2016, as well as after demonetization and also Opening balance are commensurate with the accepted turnover then the addition was not warranted and it is directed to be deleted. ITAT- Gauhati on on 20 January, 2021 in the case of Nurul Islam, Nagaon vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-Nagaon, … A.Y. 2017-18

604 total views

604 total views Section 68, 69A and 115BBE: Demonetization . Deposit of cash into bank. Where the assessee proves that regular bank deposits of cash from 01.04.2016 to 2.11.2016, as well as after demonetization and also Opening balance are commensurate with the accepted turnover…
Read more

115BBE, 68, 69A-Unexplained money, AY 2017-18, Demonetization, ITAT Gauhati

January 23, 2021

When CIT can pass order u/s 263 by holding that the order passed by the AO is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue? ITAT KOLKATA passed the order on 6th Jan 2021 in the case of RUNGTA MINES LTD. vs. PCIT?

382 total views

382 total views When CIT can pass order u/s 263 by holding that the order passed by the AO is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue? ITAT KOLKATA passed the order on 6th Jan 2021 in the case of…
Read more

263, 263-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue, AY 2013-14, In Favour of Assessee, Kolkata tribunal

January 20, 2021

Consequences of absence of the notice u/s. 143(2) of the Act before framing the assessment order? Answer order liable to to be quashed. RAM NIWAS JAIN vs.ITO. ITAT DELHI on 07-Jan-2021. Section 148: Consequences of granting approval by CIT in a mechanical manner by putting only “Yes”. Answer order liable to to be quashed. RAM NIWAS JAIN vs.ITO. ITAT DELHI on 07-Jan-2021.

436 total views

436 total views RAM NIWAS JAIN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER IN THE ITAT DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’ H. S. SIDHU, JM. ITA NOS. 6908 & 6909/DEL/2019 07-Jan-2021 Section 147, 148, 143(2) AY 2010-11 Decision in favour of:Assessee Consequences of absence of the…
Read more

142(1), 143(3), 147, 148, AY 2010-11, Delhi Tribunal, In Favour of Assessee

January 12, 2021

Section 23(1)(c). Can AO make addition on account of notional rent when the property on rent in past is lying vacant in the relevant year and the assessee mention only the reason though no evidence of efforts made was submitted except the evidence that the property was on rent in next financial year.ITAT BOMBAY passed the order on Oct 30, 2019AY 2014-15 EMPIRE CAPITAL PVT. LTD. vs. ACIT. Decision in favour of assessee

322 total views

322 total views EMPIRE CAPITAL PVT. LTD. vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX IN THE ITAT BOMBAY BENCH ‘SMC’ VIKAS AWASTHY, JM. & RAJESH KUMAR, AM. ITA No. 6204/MUM/2018 Oct 30, 2019 (2020) 181 ITD 0173 (Mumbai-Trib) Section 22, 23,…
Read more

143(3), 22, 23(1), 23(1)(c), Annual Letting Value of the property, AY 2014-15, ITAT Mumbai, notional rent

January 5, 2021