Mundra House, 822-A, Shivaju Nagar, Civil Lines, jaipur-302006 9314501680, 9314501791

B.P.Mundra

मानवता से काम करें मन के सारे काम अपने आप हो जायेंगे

इस महीने के इम्पोर्टेंट काम
  • Home
  • GST
  • Cases Income tax
  • MCA
  • Subsidy
  • TDS
  • About Us
  • contact us
  • Login
    • Admin Login
    • Staff Login
    • User Login
  • Loan
  • Apply for job
  • Click Here
  • HOW TO
  • To file ITR for AY 2022-23 kindly give details (and also evidence if yes) of following
  • Categories
    • Articles
    • Authority
    • Benami Transactions (Prohibition)
    • client
    • Constitution of India
    • Finance Act 1994
    • formalities to be completed
    • GST
    • Happiness
    • HOW TO
    • Income Tax
    • Indian Evidence Act 1872
    • Job Application
    • MCA
    • Office system
    • Papers required for filing
    • Principal of mutuality
    • rajasthan public trust
    • Smile
    • Subsidy
    • work report

Yearly Archive: 2021

B.P.Mundra > 2021

Search conducted / survey or requisition cases on or after 1st April, 2021- Assessment shall be framed under section 147 read with section 148, 148A, 149,151 of the Income Tax Act’ 1961. Explanation 2 of Section 148. FCA BPMUNDRA

 658 total views

 658 total views FCA BPMUNDRA 93145 01680, 70141 24100 Senior partner B. P. Mundra & Co.‎ Mobile Chartered Accountants ‎822 A, Mundra House, Shivaji Nagar, Near Hanuman Temple, Civil Lines, Jaipur‎-302006 Ph.No. (O) 2225110, 2225116, 2224085 [email protected] url www.bpmundraca.com Search conducted, …
Read more

147, 148, 148A, 149, 151, Articles

December 31, 2021

Table showing due date of return as per Circular No. 1712021 Dated 9 September, 2021

 378 total views

 378 total views B. P. Mundra & Co.‎ Mobile 9314501680, 9314501791‎, 8561948425 Chartered Accountants ‎822 A, Mundra House, Shivaji Nagar, Near Hanuman Temple, Civil Lines, Jaipur‎-302006 Ph.No. (O) 2225110, 2225116, 2224085 [email protected] url bpmundraca.com Table showing due date of return as…
Read more

139, Articles

December 31, 2021

The assessee requested to the Ld. AO to furnish the statement recorded u/s. 132(4) of the Act which was not provided and the assessee retracted the statement through an affidavit confirming that the search officers recorded contrary to the answer given by them and such statements are not voluntarily and not the reliable evidence as signed under pressure. Further there is no independent and cogent evidence to corroborate the statement.The moot question in these circumstances that whether these statements are voluntarily and can be considered as reliable evidence. ITAT Pune decided on 24 June, 2021 in the case DCIT vs Shikshana Prasaraka Mandali. Kindly click the link to get full order. FCA bpmundra 9314501680 [email protected]

 421 total views

 421 total views An assessee has not filed the appeal. Now while filing cross objection on appeal filed by the department the assessee submit an application in Rule 27 of the Appellate Tribunal Rules raising a new ground on which neither any decision…
Read more

132, 132(4), AY 2005-06, AY 2006-07, AY 2007-08, In Favour of Assessee, incriminating material, Pune Tribunal, Satisfaction

December 25, 2021

An assessee has not filed the appeal. Now while filing cross objection on appeal filed by the department, the assessee submit an application in Rule 27 of the Appellate Tribunal Rules raising a new ground on which neither any decision rendered by the CIT(A) nor such ground was raised in appeal to CIT(A). The moot question is can the assessee file an application? ITAT Pune decided on 24 June, 2021 in the case DCIT vs Shikshana Prasaraka Mandali. Best Course of action is to file appeal and if there is delay in appeal then file with an application of condonation of delay. Kindly click the link to get full order. FCA bpmundra 9314501680 [email protected]

 307 total views

 307 total views An assessee has not filed the appeal. Now while filing cross objection on appeal filed by the department, the assessee submit an application in Rule 27 of the Appellate Tribunal Rules raising a new ground on which neither any decision…
Read more

132, 132(4), AY 2005-06, AY 2006-07, AY 2007-08, AY 2008-09, AY 2009-10, AY 2010-11, AY 2011-12, In Favour of Assessee, Pune Tribunal, retraction, Statement

December 25, 2021

Whether excess of expenditure in the earlier years can be adjusted against the income of the subsequent year and whether such adjustment should be treated as application of income in subsequent year for charitable purposes? On this issue Bombay High Court passed the order in the case of Cit vs Institute Of Banking Personnel … on 9 July, 2003 and ITAT Mumbai again confirmed on 1 November, 2021 in the case of Dy Cit Cc-7(1), Mumbai vs Dr. D.Y. Patil International. For Full order kindly click the link. Section 11 to 13 and 11(1)(a)

 310 total views

 310 total views Whether excess of expenditure in the earlier years can be adjusted against the income of the subsequent year and whether such adjustment should be treated as application of income in subsequent year for charitable purposes? On this issue…
Read more

11, 11(1)(a), 11(2), 12, 12A, 12AA, 13, 13(1), 13(1)(b), 13(1)(c), 13(2)(a), Exemption

December 24, 2021

LLP Agreement, LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT (As per Section 23(4) of LLP Act, 2008)-Format

 243 total views

 243 total views LLP_Agreement

Articles, formalities to be completed, HOW TO, LLP, LLP incorporation, LLP Rules, MCA, MCA

December 24, 2021

consent to be appointed as Statutory Auditor of the Company u/s 139 of the Act-Format

 191 total views

 191 total views consent of appointment as statutory auditor

appointments, Articles, formalities to be completed, HOW TO, MCA

December 24, 2021

Q.Consequences when the only reason for making and upholding the disallowance of the interest is the statement recorded by the officers of the Department and that too not by the Assessing Officer himself and that too which were not made available to the assessee for cross examination ? The ITAT- Lucknow M/S. Keymen Laminators Private … vs DCIT… passed order on 2 November, 2021. For full order kindly click the link. Section 68, 153A, 133(6)

 219 total views

 219 total views Q.Consequences when the only reason for making and upholding the disallowance of the interest is the statement recorded by the officers of the Department and that too not by the Assessing Officer himself and that too which were…
Read more

133(6), 153A, 68, AY 2014-15, In Favour of Assessee, LUCKNOW ITAT

December 22, 2021

Q.Consequences of issue of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) without mentioning whether the notice is for concealment or the notice for furnishing of inaccurate particulars. ITAT Delhi decided the order on 3.11.2021 in the case of Acit, Central Circle-18, New … vs Inayatali Esmail Soomar, , Delhi. Kindly click the link to get full order.

 355 total views

 355 total views Q.Consequences of issue of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) without mentioning whether the notice is for concealment or the notice for furnishing of inaccurate particulars. ITAT Delhi decided the order on 3.11.2021 in the case of Acit, Central Circle-18, New…
Read more

271(1)(c), AY 2006-07, Concealment of income, ITAT Delhi

December 22, 2021

Q.Consequences when the Notice u/s 148 issued on amalgamating entity which ceases to exist upon the approved scheme of amalgamation despite informed to the Ld. AO. ITAT Delhi passed the order on this issue on 8 November, 2021. Section 148

 203 total views

 203 total views Q.Consequences when the Notice u/s 148 issued on amalgamating entity which ceases to exist upon the approved scheme of amalgamation despite informed to the Ld. AO. ITAT Delhi passsed the order on this issue on 8 November, 2021…
Read more

148, AY 2005-06, In Favour of Assessee, ITAT Delhi

December 22, 2021

Post navigation

1 2 3 … 6 Next →

Categories

  • 1860 (1)
  • 1956 (1)
  • 1973 (1)
  • 2002 (1)
  • 2013 (1)
  • Articles (77)
  • Authority (1)
  • Benami Transactions (Prohibition) (1)
  • client (59)
  • Code of Criminal Procedure (0)
  • Companies Act (2)
  • Constitution of India (2)
  • Cr.P.C. (2)
  • Due dates (1)
  • Finance Act 1994 (0)
  • formalities to be completed (6)
  • GST (59)
  • Happiness (4)
  • HOW TO (47)
  • HUF Property (1)
  • Income Tax (294)
  • Indian Evidence Act 1872 (1)
  • Indian Penal Code (1)
  • invalid notice (1)
  • Job Application (0)
  • MCA (3)
  • Notice 148 (0)
  • Office system (9)
  • Papers required for filing (6)
  • PMLA Act (1)
  • Prevention of Money Laundering Act (1)
  • Principal of mutuality (1)
  • rajasthan public trust (2)
  • Smile (7)
  • Subsidy (5)
  • work report (2)
  • Archives

    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019

    Recent Posts

    • कंपनीज की ऑडिट करने वाले कृपया ध्यान दें, अगर ऑडिट रिपोर्ट में इन्वेस्टमेंट के बारे में प्रॉपर्ली डिस्क्लोज नहीं किया तो सीए को पेनल्टी लगेगी इसी प्रकार कोई भी डिस्क्लोजर बाकी रह गया तो पेनल्टी लगेगी-Penalty u/s Section 450 or Failure to disclose properly in an audit report details of current investment by virtue of section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013
    • Consequences if one fails to furnish three consecutive returns of GST and the department cancels the registration?
    • Consequence when there is a delay of only 41 minutes in delivering the consignment and the Adjudicating Authority passed the order of creating Demand of Tax and Penalty of Rs.19,52,542/-
    • Mere pendency of that investigation would not sustain a Provisional Attachment Order(POA) based on allegations which do not form part of those proceedings. Delhi High Court passed the order on 24.01.2023. Kindly click the link to get full order.
    • Q: Whether outstanding demand from a company can be recovered u/s 179 from the director of the company without pointing out that non-recovery was on account of gross negligent, misfeasance or breach of duty on part of the Director in relation to the affairs of the company? The answer was given by The Hon’ble High Court Of Gujarat on dated 16.12.2022