Mundra House, 822-A, Shivaju Nagar, Civil Lines, jaipur-302006 9314501680, 9314501791

B.P.Mundra

मानवता से काम करें मन के सारे काम अपने आप हो जायेंगे

इस महीने के इम्पोर्टेंट काम
  • Home
  • GST
  • Cases Income tax
  • MCA
  • Subsidy
  • TDS
  • About Us
  • contact us
  • Login
    • Admin Login
    • Staff Login
    • User Login
  • Loan
  • Apply for job
  • Click Here
  • HOW TO
  • To file ITR for AY 2022-23 kindly give details (and also evidence if yes) of following
  • Categories
    • Articles
    • Authority
    • Benami Transactions (Prohibition)
    • client
    • Constitution of India
    • Finance Act 1994
    • formalities to be completed
    • GST
    • Happiness
    • HOW TO
    • Income Tax
    • Indian Evidence Act 1872
    • Job Application
    • MCA
    • Office system
    • Papers required for filing
    • Principal of mutuality
    • rajasthan public trust
    • Smile
    • Subsidy
    • work report

Yearly Archive: 2022

B.P.Mundra > 2022

Q: Whether outstanding demand from a company can be recovered u/s 179 from the director of the company without pointing out that non-recovery was on account of gross negligent, misfeasance or breach of duty on part of the Director in relation to the affairs of the company? The answer was given by The Hon’ble High Court Of Gujarat on dated 16.12.2022

 123 total views

 123 total views Kindly click the link below to get full order in PDF:- The Hon’ble High Court Of Gujarat on dated 16.12.2022 in the case of DEVENDRA BABULAL JAIN vs ITO Section 179i   Q: Whether outstanding demand from a…
Read more

179, Gujrat High Court, High Court, In Favour of Assessee

December 27, 2022

48th GST Council recommendation. Very useful to note

 117 total views

 117 total views B. P. Mundra & Co. 91-141-2225110, 2224085, 2225116, 2222541, Chartered Accountants Mobile:9314501680, 9314501791 822-A, Mundra House, Email:[email protected]  Shivaji Nagar, Civil Lines, website:www.bpmundraca.com Jaipur- 302006.   समझदारी एवं मानवता से काम करें आपके मन के काम अपने आप पूरे…
Read more

GST, GST Council recommendation

December 20, 2022

Q: Can income tax officer order for Provisional attachment of cash, bank, any property belonging to the assessee? HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT passed the order on dated 29/11/2022.

 137 total views

 137 total views Q: Can income tax officer order for Provisional attachment of cash, bank, any property belonging to the assessee? HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT passed the order on dated 29/11/2022. Kindly click the link to get full judgement. Head Notes:-…
Read more

132(9B), Cases Income tax, High Court of Gujarat, In Favour of Assessee

December 16, 2022

Question Whether van rent received and paid by the educational institute appearing in both side of income of expenditure account will be counted for calculating turnover of the assessee to allow the benefit U/s 10(23C) of the Act. ITAT AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR passed the order on 10.8.2022 in thc case of Baba Farid Public Welfare Society vs. ITO (Exemptions), Ward, Amritsar

 653 total views

 653 total views Question Whether van rent received and paid by the educational institute appearing in both side of income of expenditure account  will be counted for calculating turnover of the assessee to allow the benefit U/s 10(23C) of the Act. ITAT AMRITSAR…
Read more

10(23C)(iiiab), AY 2015-16, In Favour of Assessee, ITAT Amritsar ‎

December 13, 2022

Bail can be granted in PMLA cases on the ground of serious medical condition. there is no longer rigor of said two conditions under the Original Section 45(1)(ii) of the PML Act for releasing the petitioner on bail.On filing SLP by the department, SUPREME COURT OF INDIA on dated date 20.10.2022 Imposed cost of Rs. 1 lac holding as it is unnecessary SLP. Section 45(1)(ii)

 671 total views

 671 total views Bail can be granted in PMLA cases on the ground of serious medical condition. On filing SLP by the department, SUPREME COURT OF INDIA on dated  date 20.10.2022 Imposed cost of Rs. 1 lac holding as it is unnecessary…
Read more

2002, Cr.P.C., Section 439, Section 45, Section 45(1)(ii)

October 29, 2022

Whether claim not made in ITR, can be made before the appellate authorities? ITAT, RAIPUR BENCH, RAIPUR passed the order on 02.02.2022.

 121 total views

 121 total views Whether claim not made in ITR, can be made before the appellate authorities? ITAT, RAIPUR BENCH, RAIPUR passed the order on 02.02.2022. To get the full order kindly click the link   Key Tag:   can Claim be made before the appellate authorities even though not made in ITR, Section 254, Section 147, Section…
Read more

139(1), 147, 148, 251(1)(a), 254, AY 2007-08, ITAT Raipur

October 28, 2022

Please deposit employees’ contribution deducted on or before the due date otherwise the right to claim such sums as allowable deduction while computing the income was lost forever. Income Tax Act, 1961. Sections 36(1)(va), 43B – Very important Hon’ble Supreme Court decision on October 12, 2022

 369 total views

 369 total views To view / download the order in PDF kindly click the link below 43B JUDGEMENT 20221012 HEAD NOTE Please deposit employees’ contribution deducted on or before the due date otherwise the right to claim such sums as allowable deduction while computing the income was…
Read more

36(1)(va), 43B, In favour of Revenue, Supreme Court

October 14, 2022

Question: Whether assessment order would be void ab initio when the ld. Assessing Officer failed to issue a notice under section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. Further whether procsseding u/s 263 action can be taken: ITAT KOLKATA decided the issue on 27.8.2022

 123 total views

 123 total views Question: Whether assessment order would be void ab initio when  the ld. Assessing Officer failed to issue  a  notice under section 143(2)  of  the Income Tax Act. Further whether procsseding u/s  263 action can be taken:  ITAT KOLKATA decided the…
Read more

143(2), 148, 263-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue, Kolkata tribunal

October 13, 2022

Question : Can the statutory benefit under section 54 of the Income Tax Act, be denied to the assessee merely for the reason that the name of the wife was included in the property newly purchased? HIGH COURT OF DELHI passed the order on 22nd September, 2022

 266 total views

 266 total views Question : Can the statutory benefit under section 54 of the Income Tax Act, be denied to the assessee merely for the reason that the name of the wife was included in the property newly purchased? HIGH COURT…
Read more

54, AY 2015-16, Cases Income tax, Delhi High Court

October 10, 2022

Question: Whether penalty u/s 270A can be saved for deduction claimed as business deductible expenditure for payment of Cess on income tax and surcharge in any previous year?

 173 total views

 173 total views Question: Whether penalty u/s 270A can be saved for deduction claimed as business deductible expenditure for payment of Cess on income tax and surcharge in any previous year?   Key words: Penalty u/s 270A, 270A, Penalty, penalty u/s 270A can…
Read more

155 155(18), 270A, 40

September 30, 2022

Post navigation

1 2 3 4 Next →

Categories

  • 1860 (1)
  • 1956 (1)
  • 1973 (1)
  • 2002 (1)
  • 2013 (1)
  • Articles (77)
  • Authority (1)
  • Benami Transactions (Prohibition) (1)
  • client (59)
  • Code of Criminal Procedure (0)
  • Companies Act (2)
  • Constitution of India (2)
  • Cr.P.C. (2)
  • Due dates (1)
  • Finance Act 1994 (0)
  • formalities to be completed (6)
  • GST (59)
  • Happiness (4)
  • HOW TO (47)
  • HUF Property (1)
  • Income Tax (294)
  • Indian Evidence Act 1872 (1)
  • Indian Penal Code (1)
  • invalid notice (1)
  • Job Application (0)
  • MCA (3)
  • Notice 148 (0)
  • Office system (9)
  • Papers required for filing (6)
  • PMLA Act (1)
  • Prevention of Money Laundering Act (1)
  • Principal of mutuality (1)
  • rajasthan public trust (2)
  • Smile (7)
  • Subsidy (5)
  • work report (2)
  • Archives

    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019

    Recent Posts

    • कंपनीज की ऑडिट करने वाले कृपया ध्यान दें, अगर ऑडिट रिपोर्ट में इन्वेस्टमेंट के बारे में प्रॉपर्ली डिस्क्लोज नहीं किया तो सीए को पेनल्टी लगेगी इसी प्रकार कोई भी डिस्क्लोजर बाकी रह गया तो पेनल्टी लगेगी-Penalty u/s Section 450 or Failure to disclose properly in an audit report details of current investment by virtue of section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013
    • Consequences if one fails to furnish three consecutive returns of GST and the department cancels the registration?
    • Consequence when there is a delay of only 41 minutes in delivering the consignment and the Adjudicating Authority passed the order of creating Demand of Tax and Penalty of Rs.19,52,542/-
    • Mere pendency of that investigation would not sustain a Provisional Attachment Order(POA) based on allegations which do not form part of those proceedings. Delhi High Court passed the order on 24.01.2023. Kindly click the link to get full order.
    • Q: Whether outstanding demand from a company can be recovered u/s 179 from the director of the company without pointing out that non-recovery was on account of gross negligent, misfeasance or breach of duty on part of the Director in relation to the affairs of the company? The answer was given by The Hon’ble High Court Of Gujarat on dated 16.12.2022