Mundra House, 822-A, Shivaju Nagar, Civil Lines, jaipur-302006 9314501680, 9314501791

B.P.Mundra

मानवता से काम करें मन के सारे काम अपने आप हो जायेंगे

इस महीने के इम्पोर्टेंट काम
  • Home
  • GST
  • Cases Income tax
  • MCA
  • Subsidy
  • TDS
  • About Us
  • contact us
  • Login
    • Admin Login
    • Staff Login
    • User Login
  • Loan
  • Apply for job
  • Click Here
  • HOW TO
  • To file ITR for AY 2020-21 kindly give details (and also evidence if yes) of following
  • Categories
    • Articles
    • Authority
    • Benami Transactions (Prohibition)
    • client
    • Constitution of India
    • Finance Act 1994
    • formalities to be completed
    • GST
    • Happiness
    • HOW TO
    • Income Tax
    • Indian Evidence Act 1872
    • Job Application
    • MCA
    • Office system
    • Papers required for filing
    • Principal of mutuality
    • rajasthan public trust
    • Smile
    • Subsidy
    • work report

B.P.MUNDRA

Mundra House, 822-A, Shivaju Nagar, Civil Lines, jaipur-302006 9314501680, 9314501791


Now senior citizen (60 years or more) can give 15H if their income below Rs 5 lacs

B.P.Mundra > Articles > 15H for senior citizen > Now senior citizen (60 years or more) can give 15H if their income below Rs 5 lacs

admin November 16, 2019

15H for senior citizen, 192A, 193, 194, 194-I, 194A, 194DA, 194EE, 194K, 87A, Articles, Rules 29C, Section 197A(1C)

 66 total views

PRESS RELEASE, DATED: 24-05-2019

May 24, 2019

CBDT ISSUES NOTIFICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF FORM NO. 15H OF THE INCOME-TAX RULES, 1962

Sub-section (1C) of section 197A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) read with rule 29C of the Rules, inter alia, provides that no deduction of tax shall be made in case of a resident individual, who is of the age of sixty years or more, if he furnishes a declaration in Form 15H to the person responsible for paying any income of the nature referred to in section 192A, 193, 194, 194A, 194D, 194DA, 194EE, 194-I or 194K, to the effect that the tax on his estimated total income will be nil.

Further, Note 10 to Form No 15H provides for non-acceptance of declaration if the amount of income of the nature referred to in section 197A(1C) or the aggregate of the amounts of such income credited or paid or likely to be credited or paid during the previous year in which such income is to be included exceeds the maximum amount which is not chargeable to tax after allowing for deduction(s) under Chapter VIA, if any, set off of loss, if any, under the head “income from house property” for which the declarant is eligible.

Section 87A of the Act has been amended vide Finance Act, 2019 which provides that a resident individual, having total income up to Rs. 5 lakh, shall be entitled to a rebate of an amount being the amount of tax chargeable or Rs. 12,500/-, whichever is less.

However, at present, the note 10 of Form 15H does not take into account the maximum allowable rebate of Rs 12,500/- provided under section 87A as above, which is available to the assessee in respect of the tax calculated on income, there could be cases, where, though income of the assessee would be above the minimum amount chargeable to income-tax, tax liability may be nil after taking into account the rebate available under section 87A. Deduction of tax in such cases may cause undue hardship to senior citizens.

Accordingly, Income-tax Rules, 1962 have been amended by way of insertion of proviso in Note 10 of Form No 15H and have already been notified vide Notification No G.S.R. 375(E) dated 22nd May, 2019, so as to provide that the person responsible for paying the income referred to in column 15 of Part I shall accept the declaration in the case of the assessee, being a senior citizen, who is eligible for rebate of income-tax under section 87A, and his/her tax liability is nil after taking into account this rebate.

This notification is available on www.incometaxindia.gov.in.

(Surabhi Ahluwalia)

Commissioner of Income Tax

(Media & Technical Policy)

Official Spokesperson, CBDT.

Total Page Visits: 194 - Today Page Visits: 3

← Previous post

Next post →

Categories

  • Articles (50)
  • Authority (1)
  • Benami Transactions (Prohibition) (1)
  • client (54)
  • Constitution of India (1)
  • Finance Act 1994 (0)
  • formalities to be completed (1)
  • GST (56)
  • Happiness (4)
  • HOW TO (40)
  • Income Tax (228)
  • Indian Evidence Act 1872 (1)
  • invalid notice (1)
  • Job Application (0)
  • MCA (2)
  • Notice 148 (0)
  • Office system (5)
  • Papers required for filing (6)
  • Principal of mutuality (1)
  • rajasthan public trust (2)
  • Smile (7)
  • Subsidy (5)
  • work report (2)
  • Archives

    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019

    Recent Posts

    • Consequences of absence of the notice u/s. 143(2) of the Act before framing the assessment order? Answer order liable to to be quashed. RAM NIWAS JAIN vs.ITO. ITAT DELHI on 07-Jan-2021. Section 148: Consequences of granting approval by CIT in a mechanical manner by putting only “Yes”. Answer order liable to to be quashed. RAM NIWAS JAIN vs.ITO. ITAT DELHI on 07-Jan-2021.
    • Section 23(1)(c). Can AO make addition on account of notional rent when the property on rent in past is lying vacant in the relevant year and the assessee mention only the reason though no evidence of efforts made was submitted except the evidence that the property was on rent in next financial year.ITAT BOMBAY passed the order on Oct 30, 2019AY 2014-15 EMPIRE CAPITAL PVT. LTD. vs. ACIT. Decision in favour of assessee
    • अगर SVA की वैल्यूएशन DVO के वैल्यूएशन से ज्यादा आती है तो कर अधिकारी धारा 50C के प्रावधान के अनुसार कौन सी वैल्यू लेगा?ITAT Mumbai ने 18.11.2016 को Sangeeta Vijay Kumar, Mumbai vs Acit 25(2) को इसका ऑर्डर पास किया है।
    • Is punitive charges paid to the railways disallowable u/s 37(1) by holding as penalty. Ans is No. Order passed by ITAT KOLKATA on Nov 20, 2020 in the case of RUNGTA MINES PVT. LTD.vs. ACIT.
    • Is deduction under section 36 (1)(iii) for interest paid allowable when the relevant borrowed capital was given as interest free advance to sister concern for business expediency of the assessee. ITAT Jaipur passed the order on 11th Sept;2020 in the case of Kalya Awas Vikas (P). Ltd. v. ACIT