Mundra House, 822-A, Shivaju Nagar, Civil Lines, jaipur-302006 9314501680, 9314501791

B.P.Mundra

मानवता से काम करें मन के सारे काम अपने आप हो जायेंगे

इस महीने के इम्पोर्टेंट काम
  • Home
  • GST
  • Cases Income tax
  • MCA
  • Subsidy
  • TDS
  • About Us
  • contact us
  • Login
    • Admin Login
    • Staff Login
    • User Login
  • Loan
  • Apply for job
  • Click Here
  • HOW TO
  • To file ITR for AY 2020-21 kindly give details (and also evidence if yes) of following
  • Categories
    • Articles
    • Authority
    • Benami Transactions (Prohibition)
    • client
    • Constitution of India
    • Finance Act 1994
    • formalities to be completed
    • GST
    • Happiness
    • HOW TO
    • Income Tax
    • Indian Evidence Act 1872
    • Job Application
    • MCA
    • Office system
    • Papers required for filing
    • Principal of mutuality
    • rajasthan public trust
    • Smile
    • Subsidy
    • work report

B.P.MUNDRA

Mundra House, 822-A, Shivaju Nagar, Civil Lines, jaipur-302006 9314501680, 9314501791


Case Transferred to AO. This means that the your tax return would be done by ‎the AO instead of the Central Processing Cell. If any assessee gets the above ‎information then either the assessee / through AR or advocate contact to the ‎AO or wait for disposal at the AO end. ‎

B.P.Mundra > Articles > 139 > Case Transferred to AO. This means that the your tax return would be done by ‎the AO instead of the Central Processing Cell. If any assessee gets the above ‎information then either the assessee / through AR or advocate contact to the ‎AO or wait for disposal at the AO end. ‎

admin May 9, 2020 0 Comments

139, 143(1), Articles

 79 total views

Case Transferred to AO. This means that the your tax return would be done by the AO instead of the Central Processing Cell. If  any assessee gets the above information then either the assessee / through AR or advocate contact to the AO or wait for disposal at the AO end. The relevant provisions are as under:-

 

  1. Case is transferred to AO by CPC generally when it involve complexities and therefore could not be processed and thus require AO to step in. Circumstances includes following:-

 

  1. Exceptional entries found in ITR or
  2. When the assessee claims relief under section 90/91 or the sections.
  3. When the case is selected for scrutiny
  4. When the case is selected for concealment of income

 

  1. To find your jurisdiction A.O details in your e-filing account. Go to Profile Settings > My profile > PAN Details.

 

  1. Directorate of Income Tax (Systems), Delhi issued ” ITBA-ITR Processing Instruction No – 10″ as under:-

 

Steps to clear the pendency of processing of Paper Returns or E-returns transferred by CPC-ITR due to verification of relief claimed u/s 90/90A or 91 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

 

“ITBA-ITR Processing Instruction No – 10

DIRECTORATE OF INCOME TAX (SYSTEM)
ARA Center, Ground Floor, E-2, Jhandewalan Extension,
New Delhi – 110055

F.No. Pr. DGIT(S)/ITBA/ITR Processing/112/16-17/

Dated: 18.02.2020

To
All Principal Chief Commissioners of Income-tax/ CCsIT
All Principal Director Generals of Income Tax / DGsIT
All Principal Commissioners of Income-tax/CsIT/CsIT(Admin & TPS)
All Principal Directors of Income Tax/DsIT

Subject: Processing of Returns filed during Financial Year 2018-19 u/s 139, in response to notice u/s 142(1) or u/s 119(2)(b) of the I. T. Act, getting time barred for processing u/s 143(1) of the I. T. Act, on 31­-03-2020–Regarding.

Sir/Madam,

This is in reference to the subject mentioned above. Assessing Officers shall take following steps to clear the pendency of processing of Paper Returns or E-returns transferred by CPC-ITR due to verification of relief claimed u/s 90/90A or 91 of the I. T. Act or otherwise:

  1. Valid Paper Returns: Assessing Officers must complete the data entry of all paper returns filed by eligible taxpayers and push the data for processing by CPC-ITR. For paper returns filed by non-eligible taxpayers e.g., Non-Super Senior Citizen claiming refund, these are to be invalidated by AO instead of modifying the values in Data entry forms, as ultimately these returns will be marked as defective u/s 139(9) of the I. T. Act by CPC-ITR while processing the same. Therefore, AO must ensure accuracy in digitisation of paper ITRs in ITBA.
  2. E-returns for AY 2017-18 or 2018-19 transferred by CPC: Assessing Officers need to verify the e-returns transferred by CPC-ITR for verification of relief u/s 90/90A or 91 of the I. T. Act upon transfer of rights by CPC-ITR. In such cases, after taking suitable action, AO needs to submit these returns to CPC-ITR for processing.
  3. Return filed in response to Notice u/s 142(1) of the I.T.Act : It is seen that more than 2 lakhs of returns are filed by taxpayers in e-filing portal. These returns are transferred by CPC-ITR to AO for the purpose of validating the returns filed in response to notice u/s 142(1) of the I.T.Act. For the purpose of validating and to avoid mistake by AO due to overlooking of facts of returns, following field is added in Return Receipt Register -› Basic Return Details Screen:

– Latest compliance date for filing return u/s 142(1) of the I.T.Act allowed by AO: This field will be mandatory in addition to Notice Date where return is filed u/s 142(1) of the I.T.Act.

  • If filing date of return u/s 142(1) of the I.T.Act is greater than the Latest Compliance Date for filing return u/s 142(1) of the I.T.Act allowed by AO then such returns will be marked as invalid on saving the return data.
  • If filing date of return u/s 142(1)of the I.T.Act is less than or equal to the Latest Compliance Date for filing return u/s 142(1) of the I.T.Act allowed by AO then such returns will be treated as valid and can be submitted by AO for processing u/s 143(1) of the I.T.Act.

Note:- All returns filed u/s 142(1) of the I.T.Act, will be marked as invalid by the system, if AO does not take any action on or before 22-02-2020. However, AO may be able to validate such returns again after entering the mandatory details as mentioned above.

  1. Returns filed u/s 119(2)(b) of the I.T.Act, during financial year 2018-19: The Assessing Officer should enter the condonation details for validating such returns prior to be submitting the same to the CPC-ITR for processing.

Note:- All returns filed u/s 119(2)(b) of the I T Act, will be marked as invalid by the system, if AO does not take any action on or before 22-02-2020. However, AO may be able to validate such returns again after entering the condonation order details.

  1. All Assessing Officers must note that the returns pushed for processing u/s 143(1) of the I T Act, will be subject to the following:

-Prima Facie Adjustment for Paper Returns: AO needs to issue notice in this regard and also modify the data entered to enable processing by CPC-ITR.

-Defective Paper Returns: Paper returns marked as defective by CPC-ITR needs to be either corrected for any data entry mistake or are to be marked as The AO may issue notice u/s 139(9) for this purpose.

-For e-returns the PFA notices or defective notices will be issued by CPC-ITR and taxpayers are required to respond or file return u/s 139(9) within 15 days from the date of service of notice. Once new e-return is filed then same will be transferred back to AO and he needs to re-submit the same to CPC-ITR.

-The Assessing Officer will be required to approve the refund or Demand determined by CPC-ITR in order to complete the processing and release of refund (after arrear demand adjustment u/s 245) by CPC-ITR.

-Refunds cases will be subject to Range approval or subject to 241A compliance, therefore concerned authorities, AO, Range Head and PCIT must complete their approval pendency by 28-02-2020.

  1. Users are advised to contact helpdesk in case of any issues in respect of ITBA.
  2. URL of helpdesk – http://itbahelpdesk.incometax.net
  3. Help desk number — 0120-2811200 (new)
  4. Email ID — itba.helpdesk@incometax.gov.in
  5. Help desk Timings — 8.30 A.M. — 7.30 P.M. (Monday to Friday).
  6. This issues with prior approval of the Pr. DGIT(Systems), Delhi.

Yours faithfully,

(Ashim Kumar Modi)

Commissioner of Income Tax (ITBA)

Directorate of Income Tax (Systems), Delhi”

Total Page Visits: 120 - Today Page Visits: 1

← Previous post

Next post →

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Categories

  • Articles (50)
  • Authority (1)
  • Benami Transactions (Prohibition) (1)
  • client (54)
  • Constitution of India (1)
  • Finance Act 1994 (0)
  • formalities to be completed (1)
  • GST (56)
  • Happiness (4)
  • HOW TO (40)
  • Income Tax (228)
  • Indian Evidence Act 1872 (1)
  • invalid notice (1)
  • Job Application (0)
  • MCA (2)
  • Notice 148 (0)
  • Office system (5)
  • Papers required for filing (6)
  • Principal of mutuality (1)
  • rajasthan public trust (2)
  • Smile (7)
  • Subsidy (5)
  • work report (2)
  • Archives

    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019

    Recent Posts

    • Consequences of absence of the notice u/s. 143(2) of the Act before framing the assessment order? Answer order liable to to be quashed. RAM NIWAS JAIN vs.ITO. ITAT DELHI on 07-Jan-2021. Section 148: Consequences of granting approval by CIT in a mechanical manner by putting only “Yes”. Answer order liable to to be quashed. RAM NIWAS JAIN vs.ITO. ITAT DELHI on 07-Jan-2021.
    • Section 23(1)(c). Can AO make addition on account of notional rent when the property on rent in past is lying vacant in the relevant year and the assessee mention only the reason though no evidence of efforts made was submitted except the evidence that the property was on rent in next financial year.ITAT BOMBAY passed the order on Oct 30, 2019AY 2014-15 EMPIRE CAPITAL PVT. LTD. vs. ACIT. Decision in favour of assessee
    • अगर SVA की वैल्यूएशन DVO के वैल्यूएशन से ज्यादा आती है तो कर अधिकारी धारा 50C के प्रावधान के अनुसार कौन सी वैल्यू लेगा?ITAT Mumbai ने 18.11.2016 को Sangeeta Vijay Kumar, Mumbai vs Acit 25(2) को इसका ऑर्डर पास किया है।
    • Is punitive charges paid to the railways disallowable u/s 37(1) by holding as penalty. Ans is No. Order passed by ITAT KOLKATA on Nov 20, 2020 in the case of RUNGTA MINES PVT. LTD.vs. ACIT.
    • Is deduction under section 36 (1)(iii) for interest paid allowable when the relevant borrowed capital was given as interest free advance to sister concern for business expediency of the assessee. ITAT Jaipur passed the order on 11th Sept;2020 in the case of Kalya Awas Vikas (P). Ltd. v. ACIT