Latest Posts

Income Tax Slabs 2021 & Tax Rates for FY 2020-21

income tax rates for FY 2021-22

Gift deed format

CONFIRMATION OF GIFT I, Shri ,,., S/o.,, Aged 48 years R/o ……..r. do here by state on oath as under: – That my PAN No. is ,… That I am Prop. of ………../service at…. That Mr…………. s/o…….Aged …. years R/o…
Read more

Articles, Format

Receipt of Software license amounting to Rs.86,05,13,407/- cannot be charged to tax as ‘Royalties’ under the DTAA. In the same manner, the amount will escape taxation as ‘Business profits’ under Article 7 also because of it not having any PE in India. Albeit Explanation 4 to section 9(1)(vi) is applicable to the year under consideration, but section 90(2) of Act states that where the Central Government has entered into an agreement with the Government of any country outside India under sub-section (1), then, in relation to the assessee to whom such agreement applies, the provisions of this Act shall apply to the extent they are more beneficial to that assessee. ANSYS INC. vs. ACIT (INTERNATIONL TAXATION) ITAT PUNE Jun 15, 2021 Section 9(1)(vi) and Article 12 of India-US DTAA. AY 2009-10 & 2014-15.Decision in favour of: Assessee

Receipt of Software license amounting to Rs.86,05,13,407/- cannot be charged to tax as ‘Royalties’ under the DTAA. In the same manner, the amount will escape taxation as ‘Business profits’ under Article 7 also because of it not having any PE…
Read more

9(1)(vi), Article 12 of India-US DTAA

Consequences when AO reopen the case only on the basis of valuation report or when no addition is made on account of reason recorded? ITAT CHANDIGARH passed the order in the case of FATEH HOMES PVT. LTD. vs. ITO ON 16.6.2021. IN FAVOUR OF ASSESSEE. IT-CASES-246-2021.

Consequences when AO reopen the case only on the basis of valuation report or when no addition is made on account of reason recorded? ITAT CHANDIGARH passed the order in the case of FATEH HOMES PVT. LTD. vs. ITO ON…
Read more

147, 148, 151, 151(1), AY 2009-10, AY 2010-11, AY 2011-12, borrowed satisfaction, Chandigarh ITAT, Concealment of income, In Favour of Assessee, Reason recorded, Reassessment

Section 147,148, 151 Consequences when the A.O. mentioned wrong Section, wrong facts in the reasons for reopening of the assessment and acted in a mechanical manner without application of mind. ITAT Delhi in the case of Maheshwari Roller Flour Mills Pvt … vs Ito on 17 December, 2020 AY 2009-10. In favour of assessee. ITA.No.4257/Del./2019.

Section 147,148, 151 Consequences when the A.O. mentioned wrong Section, wrong facts in the reasons for reopening of the assessment and acted in a mechanical manner without application of mind. ITAT Delhi in the case of Maheshwari Roller Flour Mills…
Read more

147, 148, 151, 151(1), AY 2009-10, Concealment of income, Disposal of objection, In Favour of Assessee, Reassessment, Speaking order

Section 147,148, 151. Consequences when the Ld. AO failed to provide the complete Annexures which are the basis for reopening ? The ITAT Delhi passed the order on 15 January, 2020 in the case of Behat Holdings Ltd., New Delhi vs Ito Ward-4(3), New Delhi Order in the favour of the assessee. ITA.No.8066/Del./2019.

Section 147,148, 151. Consequences when the Ld. AO failed to provide the complete Annexures which are the basis for reopening ? The ITAT Delhi passed the order on 15 January, 2020 in the case of Behat Holdings Ltd., New Delhi…
Read more

147, 148, 151, 151(1), AY 2010-11, borrowed satisfaction, Concealment of income, Decisions, Delhi, Delhi Tribunal, In Favour of Assessee, ITAT Delhi, Order Quashed

What are the consequences if Notice u/s 148 is issued before approval under section 151(1)? ITAT Ahmedabad passed the order on 4 June, 2021. in the case of OMPRAKASH KANAYALAL SHAH vs. ITO Section 147,148,151(1). https://www.bpmundraca.com/it-cases-243-2021/

OMPRAKASH KANAYALAL SHAH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER IN THE ITAT AHMEDABAD BENCH ‘SMC’ RAJPAL YADAV, VP. ITA No. 1813/Ahd/2018 Jun 4, 2021 Section 147, 148, 151(1) AY 2010-11 Decision in favour of: Assessee What are the consequences if Notice u/s…
Read more

147, 148, 151, 151(1), Ahmedabad Tribunal, AY 2010-11, In Favour of Assessee, Order Quashed

Section 69: NO ADDITION CAN BE MADE ONLY ON THE BASIS OF INFORMATION RECEIVED When affidavit is filed and statement on oath is submitted by the assessee unless proved otherwise. ITAT- Mumbai. Shri Mohan Thakur, Mumbai vs A.C.I.T. Cent. Cir. 8(4), Mumbai on 24 May, 2021. https://www.bpmundraca.com/it-cases-242-2021/

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal – Mumbai Shri Mohan Thakur, Mumbai vs A.C.I.T. Cent. Cir. 8(4), Mumbai on 24 May, 2021 THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” Bench, Mumbai Shri Shamim Yahya (AM) & Shri Amarjit Singh (JM) I.T.A. No. 1434/Mum/2018…
Read more

69, AY 2009-10, AY 2010-11, AY 2011-12, AY 2012-13, AY 2013-14, borrowed satisfaction, In favour of Assessee (Partly), ITAT Mumbai

Consequences when the Assessing Officer was not specific as to on what basis the Assessing Officer has the reason to believe that the income of the assessee has escaped assessment. Answer was given in the case of DUGGAL ESTATES PVT. LTD. & ANR. vs. ITO ITAT DELHI, May 24, 2021, Section 147, 148 AY 2009-10. https://www.bpmundraca.com/it-cases-241-2021/

Consequences when the Assessing Officer was not specific as to on what basis the Assessing Officer has the reason to believe that the income of the assessee has escaped assessment. Answer was given in the case of DUGGAL ESTATES PVT….
Read more

147, 148, Assessment is Null and void, AY 2009-10, Delhi Tribunal, Disposal of objection, In Favour of Assessee, Reason recorded, Speaking order

The question in the present case is as to whether the information received from the investigation wing/search team would constitute ‘reason to believe’ empowering the Assessing Officer to reopen the assessment u/s 147/148. Answer is given by ITAT Ahmedabad on 12/11/2020 in the case of Hitesh Ashok Vaswani Vs DCIT. https://www.bpmundraca.com/it-cases-240-2021/

Reopening u/s 147/148 at the instance of information received from DDI wing Hitesh Ashok Vaswani Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) Appeal Number : IT(SS)A No. 118 to 123/Ahd/2019 Date of Order : 12/11/2020 AY: 2009-10 to 2014-15 The question in…
Read more

147, 148, 151, 153, Ahmedabad Tribunal, AY 2009-10, AY 2010-11, AY 2011-12, AY 2012-13, AY 2013-14, AY 2014-15, borrowed satisfaction, Concealment of income, In Favour of Assessee, In favour of Assessee (Partly)