Latest Posts

TO CONVERT A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY TO LLP

TO CONVERT A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY TO LLP NO INCOME TAX ‎1.‎ Section 47(xiiib)‎ Transactions not regarded as transfer.‎ Nothing contained in section 45 shall apply to the following transfers:—‎ i)‎ ‎————-‎ ‎(xiiib) ‎ any transfer of a capital asset…
Read more

47(xiiib), 47A, client

November 16, 2019

ट्रिब्यूनल के द्वारा सेट एसाइड ऑर्डर को डिपार्टमेंटल रिप्रेजेंटेटिव के द्वारा लिए गए फाइनेंसियल ईयर के अगले फाइनेंसियल ईयर में 31 दिसंबर तक ऑर्डर किया जा सकता है बाद में नहीं

मित्रों, हाई कोर्ट ऑफ़ दिल्ली ने 1 अक्टूबर 2018 को फैसला दिया की लिमिटेशन पीरियड की शुरुआत उस दिन से होगी जिस दिन डिपार्टमेंटल रिप्रेजेंटेटिव ऑर्डर की कॉपी ले ले। अगर कोई jurisdiction चेंज हुआ है तो वहां डिपार्टमेंटल का…
Read more

153, 153(2A), 153A, 153B, 158BB, Cases Income tax

November 16, 2019

Appeal filed manually instead of online. Proper opportunity should be allowed to file online.

Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of ‘State of Punjab Vs. Shyamalal Murari and others reported in AIR 1976 (SC) 1177’ has categorically held that courts should not go strictly by the rulebook to deny justice to the deserving litigant…
Read more

249(1), Appeal to file online

November 16, 2019

Appeal filed manually in time but online filed with delay. It was held that delay was occasioned due to technical ‎issue and lack of knowledge regarding the duly introduced e-filing procedure and being first time. So it was directed to the learned ‎Commissioner (Appeals) to decide the appeal of the assessee on merits after condoning the ‎delay

IN THE ITAT, DELHI BENCH N.K. SAINI, A.M. & AMIT SHUKLA, J.M.‎ Gurinder Singh Dhillon v. ITO ITA No.6595/Del/2016‎ ‎19 April, 2017‎ Assessee by: Deepak Thakkar, CA Revenue by: Anil Kumar Sharma, Senior Departmental Representative ORDER N. K. Saini, A.M.‎…
Read more

249(1), Appeal to file online

November 16, 2019

AGRA TRIBUNAL held on 11th Sept 2018 that Merely because certain disallowance of expenses has been made, cannot itself justify imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act.

AGRA TRIBUNAL held on 11th Sept 2018 that It is manifest from the facts recorded above that the penalty has been imposed with reference to disallowance of interest and commission expenses. It is not the case of the Revenue that…
Read more

271(1)(c)

November 16, 2019

Tran-1 form could not file owing to technical glitches in GST website, concerned ‎nodal officer who was directed to look into the issue and facilitate the uploading ‎of Form TRAN-1 without reference to any time frame

HIGH COURT OF KERALA held that here assessee was unable to file Tran-1 form within due date owing to technical ‎glitches in GST website and could not avail of Cenvat credit, the assessee was ‎granted liberty to approach to concerned…
Read more

GST, GSTR-1, technical glitches in GST website

November 16, 2019

INCENTIVE IN FORM OF DEDUCTION OF 30% OF THE EMOLUMENTS PAID TO ADDITIONAL ‎EMPLOYEES -SECTION 80JJA OF INCOME TAX ACT

80jjaINCENTIVE IN FORM OF DEDUCTION OF 30% OF THE EMOLUMENTS PAID TO ADDITIONAL ‎EMPLOYEES -SECTION 80JJA OF INCOME TAX ACT ‎1.‎ The Incentive has been made available to following:-‎ A.‎ all assesses having income under the head profits and gains…
Read more

80JJA, Deduction in respect of employment of new employees

November 16, 2019

On July 30, 2018 The High Court of Bombay held that no addition can be made in the hand of Company for share capital if the shareholders ‎is having PAN And gave affidavit

On July 30, 2018 The High Court of Bombay held that Investment made by the shareholders ‎is not hit by Section 68 of the Act if the persons who invested in the shares of the ‎respondent-assessee had PAN numbers allotted…
Read more

153(3), 153A, 68, Bobmay High Court

November 16, 2019

On Jul 16, 2018 it has been held by JAIPUR TRIBUNAL that denial of the claim ‎on the basis of suspicion without any cogent material to show that the assessee has ‎brought back his own unaccounted income in the shape of long term capital gain, the said ‎action of the AO is not sustainable

On Jul 16, 2018 it has been held by JAIPUR TRIBUNAL that denial of the claim ‎on the basis of suspicion without any cogent material to show that the assessee has ‎brought back his own unaccounted income in the shape…
Read more

10(38), Court or tribunal, Jaipur Tribunal, Penny stock

November 16, 2019