Mundra House, 822-A, Shivaju Nagar, Civil Lines, jaipur-302006 9314501680, 9314501791

मानवता से काम करें मन के सारे काम अपने आप हो जायेंगे

इस महीने के इम्पोर्टेंट काम

Home
GST
Cases Income tax
MCA
Subsidy
TDS
About Us
contact us
Login
Loan
Apply for job
Click Here
HOW TO
To file ITR for AY 2022-23 kindly give details (and also evidence if yes) of following
Categories

Monthly Archive: May 2020

B.P.Mundra > 2020 > May

Employees contribution to PF / ESI contribution-Deposited ‎timely as per section 36(1)(va) or upto due date of filing ITR u/s 139(1)-Law as propounded by case laws is different in different States.

Law as propounded by case laws is different in different States regarding Employees contribution to PF account as well as ESI contribution-Deposited timely as per section 36(1)(va) or upto due date of filing ITR u/s 139(1). Kindly note that…
Read more

2(24)(x), 36(1)(va), 43B, Articles

Case Transferred to AO. This means that the your tax return would be done by ‎the AO instead of the Central Processing Cell. If any assessee gets the above ‎information then either the assessee / through AR or advocate contact to the ‎AO or wait for disposal at the AO end. ‎

Case Transferred to AO. This means that the your tax return would be done by the AO instead of the Central Processing Cell. If any assessee gets the above information then either the assessee / through AR or advocate contact to…
Read more

139, 143(1), Articles

ITAT HYDERABAD on 29th April 2020 held that the sale of the property by the Vendee cum AGPA-holder cannot be considered as sale of property by the assessee when the Vendee has paid the entire sale consideration and has taken possession of the property as the Vendee becomes the owner of the property u/s.53A of the TP Act and u/s.2(47) it is a transfer of the property. Further it is worth noting that except being described as the Vendor, the assessee is neither a signatory to the subsequent Sale Deed nor is he the recipient of any of the sale consideration. In SAMA OM REDDY vs. ITO

ITAT HYDERABAD on 29th April 2020 held that the sale of the property by the Vendee cum AGPA-holder cannot be considered as sale of property by the assessee when the Vendee has paid the entire sale consideration and has taken…
Read more

147, 148, 2(47), 53A of Transfer of Property Act, AY 2012-13, Hyderabad ITAT, In Favour of Assessee

The provisions of Section 263 and various judgments and decisions rendered with regard to ‎Section 263 of the Act. ‎ It is well settled law that for invoking the provisions of section 263 of the Act both the ‎conditions that the order must be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue ‎needs to be satisfied.‎

Article on section 263

Kindly note Supreme Court in Vodafone Idea on 29th April 2020 held that there is ‎assessment year wise regime in processing of refund u/s 143(1) ‎

CONCLUSION Kindly note Supreme Court in Vodafone Idea on 29th April 2020 held that there is assessment year wise regime in processing of refund u/s 143(1) In respect of Assessment Years ending on 31st March 2017 or before,…
Read more

143(1), 143(1)(a), 143(1C), 143(1D), 143(2), 143(3), 241A, AY 2014-15, AY 2015-16, AY 2016-17, AY 2017-18, In favour of Revenue, Limitation period, Refund, Refund section 143(1), Supreme Court

Post navigation

← Previous 1 2 3

Categories

1860 (1)

1956 (1)

1973 (1)

2002 (1)

2013 (1)

Benami Transactions (Prohibition) (1)

client (59)

Code of Criminal Procedure (0)

Companies Act (2)

Constitution of India (2)

Finance Act 1994 (0)

formalities to be completed (6)

GST (59)

HOW TO (47)

HUF Property (1)

Income Tax (311)

Indian Evidence Act 1872 (1)

Indian Penal Code (1)

invalid notice (1)

Job Application (0)

MCA (3)

Office system (9)

Papers required for filing (6)

Prevention of Money Laundering Act (1)

Principal of mutuality (1)

rajasthan public trust (2)

Smile (7)

work report (2)

Archives

Recent Posts

Penalty u/s 271AAB(1A) when not imposed-series
GST registration: को-ओनर जिसके नाम से बिजली का बिल है को GST Registration के लिए दूसरे ऑनर से एनओसी लेने की आवश्यकता नहीं है। FCA BPMUNDRA
FCA BPMUNDRA 9314501680 bpmundra2@gmail.com क्या आयकर नोटिस 148 को इशू का नोटिस धारा 149 के अनुसार उस समय माना जाएगा जब वह नोटिस धारा 282 रूल 127 के प्रावधान के अंतर्गत प्रिसक्राइब्ड मोड ऑफ सर्विस पुरी की जाए। दिल्ली हाई कोर्ट ने 21 फरवरी 2025 मारुति सुजुकी की अपील को स्वीकार करते हुए धारा 148 में इशू नोटिस को इस आधार पर रद्द कर दिया कि नोटिस भले ही 31 मार्च 2016 को डिजिटल साइन हो गया लेकिन इश्यू 1 अप्रैल 2016 time barred होने के बाद को हुआ। Section 148, Section 282, Section 127, Section 149, time barred, notice, Delhi High Court, Quash, Quashed, Annulled
टीडीएस अमाउंट ज्यादा भर दिया है तो उसका रिफंड क्लेम करने के लिए जो सीबीडीटी ने 2 साल का लिमिटेशन पीरियड सर्कुलर से तय किया है के आधार पर आईटीओ रिफंड देने का मना नहीं कर सकता। यह सर्कुलर अल्ट्रा वायर्स दिल्ली हाई कोर्ट ने 31 जनवरी 2025 के फैसले में घोषित किया है। FCA BPMUNDRA
Rectify the filed GSTR-1 return in order to get ITC benefit