Latest Posts

Section 10(13A), Rule 2A(h)‘Performance bonus’ does not form part of ‘salary’ as defined in clause (h) of Rule 2A for the purposes of section 10(13A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Sudip Rungta v. Dy. CIT held on 10 January, 2020

Section 10(13A), Rule 2A(h). ‘Performance bonus’ does not form part of ‘salary’ as defined in clause (h) of Rule 2A for the purposes of section 10(13A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Sudip Rungta v. Dy. CIT held on 10 January,…
Read more

10(13A), In Favour of Assessee, Kolkata tribunal, Rule 2A, Rule 2A(h)

August 18, 2020

80G Requirements

B.P.Mundra & Co. Chartered Accountants Mundra House, A 822, Shivaji Nagar, Civil Lines, Adjoining Hawa Sadak, 22 Godown Bridge, Jaipur-302 001 Dial 2370113, 2225110, 2225116, 3291113 Res.2394224, 3249436, 2811601 Email: bpmundra2@gmail.com Dated…
Read more

HOW TO, Income Tax-How to

August 13, 2020

Section 28(ii)(a),28(ii)(a) SUPREME COURT OF INDIA held on Jul 22, 2020 that the payment received as non-competition fee under a negative covenant was always treated as a capital receipt till Assessment Year 2003-2004. SHIV RAJ GUPTA vs.CIT

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA held on Jul 22, 2020 that the payment received as non-competition fee under a negative covenant was always treated as a capital receipt till Assessment Year 2003-2004. SHIV RAJ GUPTA vs.CIT SHIV RAJ GUPTA vs. COMMISSIONER…
Read more

28, 28(ii)(a), AY 1995-96, Section 28(ii)(a)

Section 40(a)(ia), 194C: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA held on Jul 29, 2020 that the provisions of Section 194C were indeed applicable and the assessee-appellant was under obligation to deduct the tax at source in relation to the payments made by it for hiring the vehicles for the purpose of its business of transportation of goods. Against the assessee.SHREE CHOUDHARY TRANSPORT COMPANY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

Section 40(a)(ia), 194C: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA held on Jul 29, 2020 that the provisions of Section 194C were indeed applicable and the assessee-appellant was under obligation to deduct the tax at source in relation to the payments made by it for…
Read more

194C, 40(a)(ia), AY 2005-06, In favour of Revenue, Supreme Court

Demonetisation, Section 115BBE, 69, 154, 133A- ITAT- Jaipur- on 9 June, 2020 held that ‎the provisions of section 115BBE which are contingent on satisfaction of requirements ‎of section 69 cannot be independently applied by invoking the provisions of section 154 of ‎the Act when provisions of section 69 have been invoked by the Assessing officer while ‎passing the assessment order u/s 143(3) and at the same time, he has failed to apply the rate of ‎tax as per section 115BBE of the Act. ACIT… vs Shri Sudesh Kumar Gupta, Alwar. In ‎Favour of the assessee ‎

Section 115BBE, 69, 154, 133A- ITAT- Jaipur- on 9 June, 2020 held that the provisions of section 115BBE which are contingent on satisfaction of requirements of section 69 cannot be independently applied by invoking the provisions of section 154 of the Act when provisions of section 69 have been…
Read more

115BBE, 133A, 154, 69, AY 2017-18, In Favour of Assessee, Jaipur Tribunal

Section 54F, 139(4) ITAT, Jaipur on 6th march, 2020 Respectfully following the judgement of Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Shankar Lal Saini [2018] 89 taxmann.com 235(Raj) held that even amount deposited in Capital Gain Account Scheme before filing of return u/s 139(4) shall also be allowed for deduction as per provisions of sub- section 4 of section 54F of the Act. Smt. Renu Jain, New Delhi vs Ito. AY 2011-12

मान लीजिए किसी करदाता को आवासीय कैपिटल गेन हुआ AY 2018-19 में। वह करदाता सैलरी से आय प्राप्त करता है। धारा 139(1) आयकर रिटर्न भरने की ड्यू डेट की तारीख नौकरी वालों के लिए 31 जुलाई, 2019 है। लोंग टर्म…
Read more

139, 139(1), 139(4), 54, 54(2), 54F, 54F(4), AY 2011-12, In Favour of Assessee, Jaipur Tribunal

Rule 3A r.w.s sub-clause (b) of clause (ii) of the proviso to sub-clause (vi) of clause (2) of section 17 How to get a hospital approved so that tax exemptions can be obtained by employee for medical costs incurred by employer in the prescribed treatment.

Rule 3A r.w.s sub-clause (b) of clause (ii) of the proviso to sub-clause (vi) of clause (2) of section 17 How to get a hospital approved so that tax exemptions can be obtained by employee for medical costs incurred by…
Read more

17(2)(vi)proviso (ii)(b), 3A Rule, Articles, Rule 3A

Friends this case is belonging to Section 132, 143(1), 153A(1) and 153C. ITAT DELHI on Jun 30, 2020 on the issue of determining the six assessment years prior to the date of search. Facts in brief are that the document of the assessee was found during search operation on dated 9.10.2014 at the premises of Shri Mulchand Malu and Shri Vikas Malu and therefore the assessee was the “other person” to be assessed u/s 153C. Further there was undisputed facts that the documents etc., were handed-over to the A.O. of the assessee was in the month of September, 2016. It was held that therefore the six assessment years prior to the date of search in the case of the assessee is A.Ys. 2011-2012 to 2016-2017. Therefore, there is no jurisdiction with the A.O. to pass assessment order for the assessment year 2009-10 and the same was held to be without jurisdiction, void abinitio and was quashed. ACIT vs. KUBER PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. AY 2009-2010. In favour of the assessee

153C, AY 2009-10, Decisions, Delhi, Delhi Tribunal, Satisfaction, Satisfaction Note, Search and seizure

Section 144 r.w. Section 145(3): ITAT JAIPUR on Jun 19, 2020 held that Even if the books f ‎accounts rejected by invoking provisions of Section 145(3) due doubt on genuineness of the ‎purchases, the A.O. is bound to frame the assessment on best assessment as per provisions of ‎Section 144 r.w. Section 145(3). Therefore, after rejection of books of account, the A.O. is ‎required to estimate the income of the assessee on some reasonable and proper basis. Once the ‎past year results have attained finality and not in dispute, the same can form the basis for ‎estimating the GP rate for the current year. KEDIA EXPORTS PVT. LTD. & ANR. vs. ‎ACIT. AY 2009-10, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 Decision in favour of Assessee

Section 144 r.w. Section 145(3): ITAT JAIPUR on Jun 19, 2020 held that Even if the books f accounts rejected by invoking provisions of Section 145(3) due doubt on genuineness of the purchases, the A.O. is bound to frame the…
Read more

144, 145, 145(3), AY 2009-10, AY 2011-12, AY 2012-13, AY 2013-14, AY 2014-15, In Favour of Assessee, Jaipur Tribunal

Section 127, 132(4) HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY on Jul 15, 2019 held that when the ‎assessment of an Assessee is being transferred from one Commissionerate to another, the ‎requirement of hearing and following the principle of natural justice is inbuilt in the ‎statutory provisions contained in Section 127 of the Act. Therefore the giving of notice to ‎the assessee containing the reasons and the statements or even the gist of the statements ‎to the extent relevant for the proposed action is a basic postulate. The views of the ‎noticee are to be considered by the authority before taking any decision to confirm or ‎drop the notice. A show cause notice to be effective must be adequate so as to enable a ‎party to effectively object/respond to the same. The authority concerned is obliged to ‎consider the objections, if any, and thereafter, reach a finding one way or the other. The ‎impugned order is quashed. NARESH MANAKCHAND JAIN vs PCIT. IN favour of the ‎assessee.‎

Section 127, 132(4) HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY on Jul 15, 2019 AY 2011-12 and 2012-13 NARESH MANAKCHAND JAIN vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ORS. AKIL KURESHI & S.J. KATHAWALLA, JJ. WRIT PETITION NO.707 OF 2019 Decision…
Read more

127, 127(4), 132(4), AY 2011-12, AY 2012-13, Bobmay High Court, In Favour of Assessee