Mundra House, 822-A, Shivaju Nagar, Civil Lines, jaipur-302006 9314501680, 9314501791

B.P.Mundra

मानवता से काम करें मन के सारे काम अपने आप हो जायेंगे

इस महीने के इम्पोर्टेंट काम
  • Home
  • GST
  • Cases Income tax
  • MCA
  • Subsidy
  • TDS
  • About Us
  • contact us
  • Login
    • Admin Login
    • Staff Login
    • User Login
  • Loan
  • Apply for job
  • Click Here
  • HOW TO
  • To file ITR for AY 2022-23 kindly give details (and also evidence if yes) of following
  • Categories
    • Articles
    • Authority
    • Benami Transactions (Prohibition)
    • client
    • Constitution of India
    • Finance Act 1994
    • formalities to be completed
    • GST
    • Happiness
    • HOW TO
    • Income Tax
    • Indian Evidence Act 1872
    • Job Application
    • MCA
    • Office system
    • Papers required for filing
    • Principal of mutuality
    • rajasthan public trust
    • Smile
    • Subsidy
    • work report

Tag Archive: incriminating material

B.P.Mundra > incriminating material

Q. What will happen when the revenue seized a documents, which is computer generated loose sheet and found during the search of third party who is neither assessee nor any authorized person of the assessee. The HIGH COURT OF DELHI in the case of PCIT vs. STC DEVELOPER PVT. LTD. Decided on Dec 15, 2021 on similar issue. Section 153C. Search & Seizure.

 213 total views

 213 total views Q.Section 153C. What will happen when the revenue seized a documents, which is computer generated loose sheet and found during the search of third party who is neither assessee nor any authorized person of the assessee. The HIGH…
Read more

153C, Delhi High Court, Delhi Tribunal, In Favour of Assessee, ITAT Delhi

December 22, 2021

Incriminating material of the assessee found in the search of 3rd party then the assessment or reassessment proceeding of the assessee under which section 148 or 153C of the Income Tax Act? ITAT Delhi Bench again confirmed on Sep 17, 2021. in the case of CITY LIFE PROJECTS PVT. LTD. vs. ITO

 301 total views

 301 total views CITY LIFE PROJECTS PVT. LTD. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER IN THE ITAT DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’ N. K. BILLAIYA, AM. ITA No. 2668/DEL/2019 Sep 17, 2021 Section 143(3), 147, 148, 153C AY 2010-11 Decision in favour of: Assessee Q.Incriminating…
Read more

148, 153C, AY 2010-11, In Favour of Assessee, ITAT Delhi

September 21, 2021

Section 132 When no incriminating material is shown by the Ld. AO therefore disallowance made only on ad-hoc basis is not permissible under the Income Tax Act. SHARUK PASSI & ANR. vs.DCIT ITAT Delhi order on Mar 19, 2020. IT-CASES-213-2020

 226 total views

 226 total views Order in brief Section 143 assessment completed without giving any adverse finding on issue categorically inquired. Now merely creating a doubt of the same issue does not suffice the Assessing Officer to reopen the case u/s 148 of…
Read more

132, 143(3), 147, 148, addition on adhoc basis, Adhoc addition, AY 2005-06, AY 2012-13, Delhi, Delhi Tribunal, In Favour of Assessee, incriminating material

October 11, 2020

Section 132,148 Cancelled receipt of Rs. 11 lacs showing total transaction of Rs. 61 lacs signed by Sanjeev on behalf of Romy was found and Romy surrendered Rs. 11 Lacs only. AO has not confronted contents of said receipts from S. Addition made of Rs. 50 Lacs is deleted in the absence of any other corroborative material before AO. ROMI LAL NANDA vs.ITO. ITAT Delhi order date 28.9.2020. IT-CASES-212-2020

 213 total views

 213 total views ROMI LAL NANDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER IN THE ITAT DELHI BENCH ‘G’ R.K. PANDA, AM & SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JM. ITA No. 792/Del/2016 Sep 28, 2020 Section 132,148  AY 2008-09 Decision in favour of: Assessee   Section 132 Cancelled receipt…
Read more

131(1), 132, 147, 148, 68, AY 2008-09, Delhi, Delhi Tribunal, Dumb, In Favour of Assessee, incriminating material

October 9, 2020

Section 132, 153A What AO can do with item found in search is already disclosed in ITR and Balance Sheet submitted?IT-CASES-210-2020

 336 total views

 336 total views ALANKAR SAPHIRE DEVELOPERS & ORS. vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS. IN THE ITAT DELHI BENCH ‘F’ BHAVNESH SAINI, JM & O. P. KANT, AM. ITA No. 2277/Del./2016, 2278/Del./2016, 2279/Del./2016, 2606/Del./2016, 2607/Del./2016, 2608/Del./2016, 122/Del./2017, 675/Del./2017, 6444/Del./2015,…
Read more

132, 153A, AY 2003-04, AY 2004-05, AY 2005-06, Delhi, Delhi Tribunal, In Favour of Assessee, incriminating material, Search and seizure

September 30, 2020

क्या होगा जब किसी के यहां आयकर छापा पड़े और वहां पड़े किसी इनक्रिमिनेटिंग मैट्रियल पर आपका नाम हो? आईटीऐटी दिल्ली ने 28 अप्रैल 2020 को क्या फैसला दिया? IT-CASES-209-2020

 336 total views

 336 total views PAWAN KUMAR DUA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX IN THE ITAT DELHI BENCH ‘F’ K. PANDA, AM & SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JM. ITA Nos. 6588 to 6590/Del/2018 Apr 28, 2020 Section 132, 153A AY 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16…
Read more

132A-Powers to requisition books of account, 153A, In Favour of Assessee, incriminating material

September 29, 2020

दिल्ली हाईकोर्ट ने 1 अगस्त 2017 को फैसला देते हुए कहा कि आयकर छापे के दौरान धारा 132 4 में लिए गए स्टेटमेंट अपने आप में incriminating material नहीं है केवल इस आधार पर ना तो assumption of jurisdiction u/s 153 A हो सकता है और ना ही कोई एडिशन किया जा सकता है.PCIT vs.BEST INFRASTRUCTURE (INDIA) PVT. LTD. & ORS. IT-CASES-208-2020

 370 total views

 370 total views दिल्ली हाईकोर्ट ने 1 अगस्त 2017 को फैसला देते हुए कहा कि आयकर छापे के दौरान धारा 132 4 में लिए गए स्टेटमेंट अपने आप में incriminating material नहीं है केवल इस आधार पर ना तो assumption of…
Read more

132, 132(4), 153A, AY 2005-06, AY 2006-07, AY 2007-08, AY 2008-09, AY 2009-10, Decisions, Delhi, Delhi High Court, High Court, In Favour of Assessee, incriminating material, Search and seizure, Statement, Statement under section 132(4)

August 20, 2020

Section 147, 132 Gujarat High Court on 25 February, 2020 held that when Search and seizure of incriminating ‎material is at third party and have not in the name of or in hand writings or signature of the ‎assessee, also no such transaction is with third party then in the absence of any other ‎independent material to corroborate the statement of third party no addition can be made.‎ it-cases-205-2020

 234 total views

 234 total views Gujarat High Court on 25 February, 2020 held that when Search and seizure of incriminating material is at third party and have not in the name of or in hand writings or signature of the assessee, also no…
Read more

132, 143(3), 147, 68, AY 2006-07, Gujrat High Court, In Favour of Assessee, incriminating material

April 18, 2020

ITAT KOLKATA on Mar 18, 2020 held that the assessment made u/s 153A/143(3) of the ‎Act is invalid in the absence of any incriminating material found during course of search ‎hence the addition made by AO in assessment completed was beyond scope. ‎

 416 total views

 416 total views DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS. vs. BHAVYA MERCHANDISE PVT. LTD. & ORS. IN THE ITAT KOLKATA BENCH ‘B’ P.M. JAGTAP, VP & S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM. ITA No. 2148/Kol/2017, IT(SS)A No. 139/Kol/2017 (C.O. No. 110/Kol/2018, 09/Kol/2017)               …
Read more

143(3), 153A, AY 2011-12, In Favour of Assessee, incriminating material, Kolkata tribunal, Satisfaction, Search and seizure

April 1, 2020

The proceedings u/s 153C could be initiated against a party only if the document seized ‎during the search and seizure proceedings of another person belonging to the assessee ‎concerned. ‎

 435 total views

 435 total views The proceedings u/s 153C could be initiated against a party only if the document seized during the search and seizure proceedings of another person belonging to the assessee concerned. Unless, the AO of the searched person has arrived…
Read more

153C, ITAT Mumbai

November 16, 2019

Post navigation

1 2 Next →

Categories

  • Articles (72)
  • Authority (1)
  • Benami Transactions (Prohibition) (1)
  • client (58)
  • Constitution of India (2)
  • Due dates (1)
  • Finance Act 1994 (0)
  • formalities to be completed (6)
  • GST (58)
  • Happiness (4)
  • HOW TO (47)
  • HUF Property (1)
  • Income Tax (281)
  • Indian Evidence Act 1872 (1)
  • invalid notice (1)
  • Job Application (0)
  • MCA (3)
  • Notice 148 (0)
  • Office system (9)
  • Papers required for filing (6)
  • Principal of mutuality (1)
  • rajasthan public trust (2)
  • Smile (7)
  • Subsidy (5)
  • work report (2)
  • Archives

    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019

    Recent Posts

    • Q Can condonation of delay in filing appeal be acceded without a written request? The Hon’ble ITAT, Agra passed the order in the similar circumstances in the case of Netra Pal Singh v. Asstt. CIT on dated 23 April 2003 vide IT(SS)A No. 89/Del/1997 Block period 1985-86 to 1995-96
    • Question: Consequences on deduction claimed under section 80-IB (7) of the act when the assessee not furnished return of income before the due date specified under section 139(1) of the act? Another question is what is the remedy for late filing of the return and to get the deduction claimed under section 80-IB (7) of the act? ITAT BANGALORE decided in the case of Hyagreeva Hotels & Resorts (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT on 18 July, 2022.
    • Consequences of not filing Form 10B electronically. Whether benefit of exemption under sections 11 and 12 shall be available to the assessee in respect of income derived? Another question is what to do in such circumstances? ITAT, AHMEDABAD BENCH ITA No. 355 & 356/AHD/2021 decided on the issue of dated 15 July, 2022 in the case of Ambica Sarvajnik Trust Anklav v. Dy. CIT (CPC). Kindly click the link to get the answer and full decision.
    • ITAT DELHI “SMC” BENCH Pronouncement the order on 27.5.2022 in the case of Bharat Bhushan Jain Vs. ITO.
    • हाई कोर्ट ऑफ मद्रास ने 2 अगस्त 2017 को फैसला देते हुए कहा कि अगर कोई एग्रीकल्चर लैंड धारा 2(1A) के अनुसार एग्रीकल्चर लैंड है यदि आयकर दाता ने उसकी एजुकेशन इनकम नहीं बताई है लेकिन उसपर खेती के प्रूफ मौजूद है तो उस पर आयकर नहीं लगेगा कारण की धारा 2(14) में कैपिटल एसेट में एग्रीकल्चर लैंड नहीं आती