Tag Archive: Past History

Section 144 r.w. Section 145(3): ITAT JAIPUR on Jun 19, 2020 held that Even if the books f ‎accounts rejected by invoking provisions of Section 145(3) due doubt on genuineness of the ‎purchases, the A.O. is bound to frame the assessment on best assessment as per provisions of ‎Section 144 r.w. Section 145(3). Therefore, after rejection of books of account, the A.O. is ‎required to estimate the income of the assessee on some reasonable and proper basis. Once the ‎past year results have attained finality and not in dispute, the same can form the basis for ‎estimating the GP rate for the current year. KEDIA EXPORTS PVT. LTD. & ANR. vs. ‎ACIT. AY 2009-10, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 Decision in favour of Assessee

Section 144 r.w. Section 145(3): ITAT JAIPUR on Jun 19, 2020 held that Even if the books f accounts rejected by invoking provisions of Section 145(3) due doubt on genuineness of the purchases, the A.O. is bound to frame the…
Read more

144, 145, 145(3), AY 2009-10, AY 2011-12, AY 2012-13, AY 2013-14, AY 2014-15, In Favour of Assessee, Jaipur Tribunal

ITAT Ahmedabad on 11th March, 2020-Diary seized, surrender made and survey statement recorded under section 133A. But having no corroborative evidences. Exorbitant profit is not possible in the line of business of the assessee. No other business is found. No unexplained investment is found. It was held that Since it is business receipt only GP based on past history can be added as income.

Diary seized, surrender made and survey statement recorded under section 133A. But having no corroborative evidences. Exorbitant profit is not possible in the line of business of the assessee. No other business is found. No unexplained investment is found. It…
Read more

133A, 234A, 292C, Ahmedabad Tribunal, AY 2013-14, In favour of Assessee (Partly), Survey

It is well settled that in case the books of accounts are rejected the income of the business in which the Assessee was engaged can be determined by estimating the profit rate considering past history.

INCOME TAX OFFICER vs. ASHOK KUMAR PROP. M/S CHHABRA TIMBER STORE IN THE ITAT CHANDIGARH BENCH ‘A’ N.K. SAINI, VP & RAJPAL YADAV, JM. ITA No. 12/Chd/2019 8 Nov, 2019 Section 36(1)(iii), 44AB, 133A, 143(1), 143(3), 144, 145(3 Asst. Year…
Read more

133A, 143(1), 143(3), 144, 145(3), 36(1)(iii), 44AB, Chandigarh ITAT

November 16, 2019